Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CrossBrowserTesting VS JSHint

Compare CrossBrowserTesting VS JSHint and see what are their differences

Zoho Projects
Turn every Project into a Success Story with Zoho Projects featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

JSHint logo JSHint

New JSHint website. Anton Kovalyov Oct 1st, 2013. For the last couple of weeks I've been working on a new homepage for JSHint and today I'm proud to announce the new jshint. com! JSHint Website.
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23
  • JSHint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

JSHint features and specs

  • Customization
    JSHint allows developers to configure various options to tailor the linting process according to their specific project requirements.
  • Community Support
    JSHint is widely used and has a robust community, which means plenty of tutorials, plugins, and community-driven improvements are available.
  • Real-time Feedback
    JSHint provides real-time feedback on JavaScript code, helping developers catch errors and enforce coding standards as they write their code.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with many editors and build tools, making it easier to incorporate into existing development workflows.
  • Compliance
    JSHint helps enforce consistent coding styles and coding standards, which can be beneficial for team projects.

Possible disadvantages of JSHint

  • Performance
    Running JSHint can sometimes be slower compared to other modern linters, which might affect the workflow, especially in large projects.
  • Development Activity
    JSHint's development activity has been perceived as slower compared to newer tools like ESLint. This might mean slower implementation of new features and standards.
  • Feature Set
    JSHint has fewer rules and customization options compared to more modern linting tools like ESLint, which can limit its usefulness for complex projects.
  • False Positives
    Sometimes, JSHint might flag code that is actually correct based on personal or team coding standards, which can lead to the need for configuration overrides.
  • Deprecation Risk
    There is a perceived risk that JSHint might become deprecated as the development community shifts towards newer tools with more features.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

Analysis of JSHint

Overall verdict

  • Yes, JSHint is considered a good tool for JavaScript developers who need to ensure code quality and consistency. It provides valuable insights and helps maintain a clean codebase, although it might not be as feature-rich or extensible as some more modern alternatives.

Why this product is good

  • JSHint is a widely used static code analysis tool for JavaScript, which helps developers identify potential errors and enforce coding conventions. It offers a flexible configuration and is highly customizable, allowing developers to tailor the tool to fit their coding style and project requirements. Additionally, it has strong community support and integrates well with various text editors and build systems.

Recommended for

    JSHint is recommended for developers and teams seeking a lightweight and easy-to-configure linter for JavaScript projects. It is particularly useful for small to medium-sized projects and developers who prefer a quick setup without extensive configuration. However, for projects that require more sophisticated analysis or support for newer JavaScript features, exploring other tools like ESLint might be beneficial.

CrossBrowserTesting videos

+ Add

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison โ€“ LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

JSHint videos

+ Add

Improve code quality with JSHint

More videos:

  • Review - JSHint- JavaScript Code Quality Tool, detect errors and potential
  • Review - JavaScript Static Analysis - Linting with JSLint, JSHint, and ESLint

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrossBrowserTesting and JSHint)

CrossBrowserTesting

JSHint

Website Testing
100 100%
Website Testing
0% 0
Development
0 0%
Development
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0
Code Analysis
0 0%
Code Analysis
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and JSHint. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JSHint should be more popular than CrossBrowserTesting. It has been mentiond 16 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we donโ€™t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
  • How do yโ€™all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: about 5 years ago
View more

JSHint mentions (16)

  • ESLint adoption guide: Overview, examples, and alternatives
    Emerging as a fork of JSLint, JSHint was introduced to offer developers more configuration options. Despite this, it remains less flexible than ESLint, particularly in terms of rule customization and plugin support, limiting its adaptability to diverse project needs. The last release dates back to 2022. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Mastering Node.js
    JSHint is a code-checking tool that'll save you loads of time finding stupid errors. Find a plugin for your text editor that will automatically run it on your code. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Trouble with Syntax
    Also, if you are going to code for this sheet and do not know about the website jshint.com, you need to know about jshint.com. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Iโ€™m trying to play Shinsetsu Mahou Shoujo + but it keeps giving me an error. Iโ€™ve tried changing the folder location, and renaming the folderโ€ฆ I also tried English, Japanese, and even Chinese locale. Can anybody help?
    There is an error in some file. Or maybe some wine shenanigans (never used it). You can try searching for the file item-possessionLimit.js and paste it into something like https://jshint.com/ to get an analysis and try to fix it. But it might give you further errors or file might be packed somewhere. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Trying not to be a jerk to myself. :(
    If you are coding for this sheet and you do not know about jshint.com ... Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CrossBrowserTesting and JSHint, you can also consider the following products

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

RequireJS - RequireJS is a JavaScript file and module loader.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Loading...