Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CrossBrowserTesting VS Flowplayer

Compare CrossBrowserTesting VS Flowplayer and see what are their differences

Backlog
Built for teams that move fast — Backlog is the all-in-one project management solution with exactly what you need, and nothing you don’t. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Flowplayer logo Flowplayer

Flowplayer is a video player for web sites.
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23
  • Flowplayer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-05

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Flowplayer features and specs

  • High-Quality Streaming
    Flowplayer provides high-quality streaming with adaptive bitrate technology, ensuring smooth playback even with varying internet speeds.
  • Customization
    Flowplayer offers extensive customization options for the player’s appearance and functionality, enabling seamless brand integration.
  • Analytics
    The platform provides detailed analytics and reporting features, allowing users to track viewer engagement and video performance effectively.
  • Scalability
    Flowplayer is designed to handle a large volume of traffic, making it suitable for businesses of all sizes to scale their streaming needs.
  • Security Features
    It includes robust security features like DRM (Digital Rights Management) and token-authenticated streaming to protect content from unauthorized access.
  • Multi-Device Compatibility
    Flowplayer ensures multi-device compatibility, allowing videos to be easily accessible on desktops, tablets, and mobile devices.

Possible disadvantages of Flowplayer

  • Cost
    Flowplayer can be expensive compared to other video hosting solutions, particularly for startups and small businesses with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    The platform offers many features and customization options, which might present a steep learning curve for new users or non-technical staff.
  • Limited Free Version
    Flowplayer’s free version comes with limited features and includes branding, which may not be suitable for professional use or extensive streaming requirements.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity
    As with any cloud-based streaming service, Flowplayer’s performance is heavily dependent on the quality of the user’s internet connection.
  • Support Response Time
    Some users have reported slower support response times, which can be an issue for businesses requiring quick resolution to technical problems.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

Analysis of Flowplayer

Overall verdict

  • Flowplayer is a solid choice for those needing a reliable and customizable video player, particularly if performance and integration with existing systems are top priorities. Its suite of features makes it competitive in the streaming service market, particularly for enterprises with specific video hosting needs.

Why this product is good

  • Flowplayer is known for its lightweight and customizable video player, which is particularly suited for businesses looking to integrate video seamlessly into their websites or applications. It offers features such as adaptive streaming, analytics, and ad support. Additionally, it supports various video formats and provides security features to protect content.

Recommended for

    Flowplayer is recommended for businesses, digital agencies, and media companies seeking to deliver high-quality video experiences on their websites. It's especially suitable for those who need advanced customization options, detailed analytics, and support for advertisements. Small to medium-sized enterprises that require a scalable solution for their growing video needs would also benefit from using Flowplayer.

CrossBrowserTesting videos

+ Add

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Flowplayer videos

+ Add

Pubiltio with FlowPlayer

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Use a Flowplayer Wordpress Plugin To Show Any Video In Wordpress

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrossBrowserTesting and Flowplayer)

CrossBrowserTesting

Flowplayer

Website Testing
100 100%
Website Testing
0% 0
Video Platform
0 0%
Video Platform
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0
YouTube Tools
0 0%
YouTube Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and Flowplayer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CrossBrowserTesting and Flowplayer

CrossBrowserTesting Reviews

We have no reviews of CrossBrowserTesting yet.
Be the first one to post

Flowplayer Reviews

Top 26 Alternatives to Vimeo in 2024: Pricing, Features & More
If you are looking for a straightforward alternative to Vimeo, Flowplayer could be an option for you. Flowplayer is a streaming solution designed to host live and on-demand video streams.
Source: www.dacast.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting should be more popular than Flowplayer. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • How do y’all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: over 4 years ago
View more

Flowplayer mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CrossBrowserTesting and Flowplayer, you can also consider the following products

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

JW Player - JW Player is an embeddable media player.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

VideoJS - VideoJS is an HTML5 Video Player, built with Javascript and CSS, with a fallback to a Flash video...

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Plyr - A simple, accessible and customisable HTML5 media player

Loading...