Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CrossBrowserTesting VS Exstats

Compare CrossBrowserTesting VS Exstats and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Exstats logo Exstats

Analytics for Chrome, Edge, and Firefox extensions in one dashboard. Track installs, ratings, reviews, and search rankings across 360,000 extensions, updated daily.
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23
  • Exstats Store Trends
    Store Trends //
    2026-05-16
  • Exstats Product Dashboard
    Product Dashboard //
    2026-05-16
  • Exstats Extension Explorer
    Extension Explorer //
    2026-05-16
  • Exstats Keyword Tracking
    Keyword Tracking //
    2026-05-16

Most browser extension developers ship the same product to Chrome, Edge, and Firefox, then try to track its performance across three separate developer dashboards, three different review feeds, and three sets of keyword rankings. The data is fragmented, history is short, and there is no easy way to compare a release against a competitor over time.

Exstats fixes this by grouping the Chrome, Edge, and Firefox versions of an extension into one product view, alongside the competitors you want to watch. It tracks daily changes in installs, ratings, reviews, category rank, and search rank, then keeps up to a full year of history so weekly and monthly trends are visible at a glance. Email and Slack alerts fire on rating drops, rank shifts, and competitor updates so a regression does not sit unnoticed for a week.

Beyond your own products, the Extension Explorer indexes 360,000+ extensions with 30+ searchable fields and exportable CSV or XLSX, the Keyword Tracker suggests AI-generated keyword ideas and tracks rank by store, and the Store Trends dashboard reports category growth, rating distributions, and review activity across each store.

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Exstats features and specs

  • Supported stores
    Chrome Web Store, Microsoft Edge Add-ons, Firefox Add-ons
  • Database size
    280,000+ extensions, 6M+ reviews
  • Data refresh
    Daily
  • Historical data
    Up to 1+ year on Business plan
  • Product Dashboard
    Track your listings across all three stores in one view with ratings, users, reviews, and rank
  • Competitor tracking
    Side by side comparison with metrics, reviews, and version updates
  • Keyword tracking
    Daily rank checks with 1D, 7D, 30D deltas and full rank history
  • AI keyword suggestions
    Built in keyword discovery powered by AI
  • Extension Explorer
    Searchable market browser with 30+ fields, filters, and daily deltas
  • Store Trends
    Market level charts for category growth, rating distribution, review activity, and developer counts
  • Alerts
    Email and Slack notifications on ranking, rating, and competitor changes
  • Data export
    CSV and XLSX up to 5,000 rows

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

Analysis of Exstats

Overall verdict

  • Exstats appears to be a useful analytics and statistics platform, but you should verify its current features, pricing, and reliability directly before committing, as independent details are limited.

Why this product is good

  • Provides data tracking and statistical analysis tools that can help users make informed decisions
  • Typically offers dashboards and reporting features for monitoring performance metrics
  • May integrate with existing workflows to centralize data insights
  • Can save time by automating data collection and visualization

Recommended for

  • Small to medium businesses looking to track performance metrics
  • Analysts and data-driven professionals who need statistical reporting
  • Website or app owners wanting to monitor traffic and user behavior
  • Teams seeking an affordable alternative to enterprise analytics suites

CrossBrowserTesting videos

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Exstats videos

No Exstats videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrossBrowserTesting and Exstats)
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Data Analytics
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Competitor Analysis
0 0%
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing CrossBrowserTesting and Exstats.

What makes your product unique?

Exstats's answer:

Exstats treats an extension as one product across stores, not as three separate listings on three sites. The Chrome, Edge, and Firefox versions sit in one row, and history, reviews, alerts, and competitor data flow from there.

What's the story behind your product?

Exstats's answer:

Exstats started because developers shipping browser extensions kept running into the same wall. The Chrome Web Store, Edge Add-ons, and Firefox Add-ons each give publishers a siloed view with short history, no competitor data, and no way to compare a release against a rival over time. Teams that maintained extensions on more than one store ended up checking three dashboards a day and keeping competitor numbers in spreadsheets. We built Exstats so an extension and its store versions live in one place, with daily history, alerts, and competitor tracking built in.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Exstats's answer:

Unified multi-browser view. Exstats is the only dashboard that groups the Chrome, Edge, and Firefox versions of an extension into one product, with shared history and shared alerts. Most analytics tools cover only the Chrome Web Store, or split the three stores across separate sites.

Full year of daily history. Stores show current numbers and a short trail. Exstats keeps daily snapshots for up to a year so weekly and monthly trends, rating regressions, and competitor launches are visible at a glance.

Reviews from every store in one table. Chrome, Edge, and Firefox reviews sit in one sortable, filterable table, so a developer can read a week of feedback without rotating between three dashboards.

Keyword tracking with AI suggestions. Search rank is tracked per store with daily change indicators, and the keyword tool suggests new keywords from competitor listings rather than expecting the developer to bring a complete list.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Exstats's answer:

Exstats is built for the people shipping and growing browser extensions.

The core audience is independent extension developers and small product teams who need one place to watch installs, ratings, reviews, and keyword rank for their extensions, on whichever stores they publish to.

A second audience is extension growth and marketing specialists who track competitor launches, rating shifts, and category trends on behalf of clients and need a single view across Chrome, Edge, and Firefox rather than three separate workflows.

A third audience is product and engineering teams at companies whose extension is a meaningful acquisition or retention surface, who need daily alerts, exportable data, and API access for internal dashboards.

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and Exstats. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
  • How do y’all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: over 5 years ago
View more

Exstats mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Exstats yet. Tracking of Exstats recommendations started around May 2026.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CrossBrowserTesting and Exstats, you can also consider the following products

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

ChromeStats - Compare and analyze Chrome extensions and Android Apps

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

ExtPose - Optimize your Chrome extension to get more installs

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Extension Ranker - Boost your Chrome Extension ranking with the help of Extension Ranker — driving more impressions, installs, and sustainable user growth.