Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CrossBrowserTesting VS DevStream

Compare CrossBrowserTesting VS DevStream and see what are their differences

Zoho Projects
Turn every Project into a Success Story with Zoho Projects featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

DevStream logo DevStream

DevStream is an open source DevOps toolchain manager, empowering you to set up flexible DevOps toolchains in 5 minutes with 1 command.
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23
  • DevStream Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-02

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

DevStream features and specs

  • Open Source
    Being open source allows for transparency, customizability, and community contributions, which can help improve the tool over time and better fit specific user needs.
  • Active Community
    An active community can provide support, share solutions, and contribute to the rapid development and debugging of the tool.
  • Integration Capabilities
    DevStream can be integrated with various other tools and platforms, enhancing its functionality and making it more adaptable to different workflows.
  • Documentation
    Having thorough and detailed documentation can help users more easily understand and utilize the tool's features, reducing the learning curve.

Possible disadvantages of DevStream

  • Maintenance
    Being community-driven, there might be periods where updates and bug fixes are less frequent, depending on community involvement.
  • Complexity
    The tool might have a steep learning curve, especially for users who are not familiar with DevOps practices or similar technologies.
  • Compatibility Issues
    There is a potential for compatibility issues with certain systems or platforms, depending on the specific configurations and updates of both the tool and the environment it's being used in.
  • Limited Resources
    As an open-source project, it might not have the same level of resources (such as customer support or dedicated development teams) as proprietary solutions, which might limit the speed and scope of developments.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

CrossBrowserTesting videos

+ Add

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison โ€“ LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

DevStream videos

+ Add

Warframe Devstream 174 Cross Save Cross Trade News! Abyss of Dagath Review! What Is Next!

More videos:

  • Review - Warframe | Devstream 173: Hydroid Rework, Dagath Gameplay, Grendel Prime, Companion Rework + More!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrossBrowserTesting and DevStream)

CrossBrowserTesting

DevStream

Website Testing
100 100%
Website Testing
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and DevStream. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting should be more popular than DevStream. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: over 3 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we donโ€™t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
  • How do yโ€™all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: about 5 years ago
View more

DevStream mentions (2)

  • Creating a DevStream (dtm) Plugin for Anything
    Check out our README for the latest status. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • DevStream Codebase Walkthrough (Open-Source DevOps Tool Manager)
    If you haven't heard of DevStream yet, please have a quick glance over our README. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CrossBrowserTesting and DevStream, you can also consider the following products

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Digger - Build on AWS without having to learn it, no-code DevOps

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Relay Public Beta - IFTTT for DevOps

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

SaltStack For DevOps - Fast and simple IT automation and configuration management

Loading...