Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
BT

CrossBrowserTesting VS Browser Tamer

Compare CrossBrowserTesting VS Browser Tamer and see what are their differences

Backlog
Built for teams that move fast — Backlog is the all-in-one project management solution with exactly what you need, and nothing you don’t. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Browser Tamer logo Browser Tamer

Makes correct URLs open in browsers you want instead of the system defaults.
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23
  • Browser Tamer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Browser Tamer features and specs

  • Centralized Browser Management
    Browser Tamer allows users to manage multiple browsers from a single interface, providing a centralized solution for browser selection and management.
  • Enhanced Productivity
    By streamlining the process of switching between browsers, Browser Tamer can improve productivity for users who need to work with multiple browsers regularly.
  • Customization
    Users can customize the tool to suit their specific needs, such as setting default browsers for different tasks or websites, enhancing user experience.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Browser Tamer supports multiple operating systems, allowing users to have a consistent experience across different devices.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, Browser Tamer invites community contributions for better features and quicker issue resolution.

Possible disadvantages of Browser Tamer

  • Learning Curve
    New users may experience a learning curve when familiarizing themselves with the features and settings of Browser Tamer.
  • Limited Integration
    Some users might find limited integration with other third-party tools or workflows they rely on.
  • Potential Bugs
    As with many open-source projects, users might encounter bugs or stability issues, especially in newer versions.
  • Lack of Commercial Support
    Users looking for dedicated support might be disappointed, as open-source projects often rely on community forums for troubleshooting.
  • Not Suitable for All Users
    Casual users who only utilize a single browser might not find the features of Browser Tamer necessary or beneficial.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

CrossBrowserTesting videos

+ Add

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Tamer videos

No Browser Tamer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrossBrowserTesting and Browser Tamer)

CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Tamer

Website Testing
83 83%
Website Testing
17% 17
Project Management
53 53%
Project Management
47% 47
Browser Testing
100 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0
Automated Testing
100 100%
Automated Testing
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and Browser Tamer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • How do y’all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: over 4 years ago
View more

Browser Tamer mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Browser Tamer yet. Tracking of Browser Tamer recommendations started around Jul 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CrossBrowserTesting and Browser Tamer, you can also consider the following products

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Browser Select - Browser Select is a utility to dynamically select the browser you want instead of just having one...

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Hurl - Choose a Browser - A windows utility that lets you choose the browser on the click of a link

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Choosy - Choosy opens links in different browsers as specified, according to rules, set by the user.

Loading...