Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CrossBrowserTesting VS Behat

Compare CrossBrowserTesting VS Behat and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Behat logo Behat

Behat is a tool that makes behavior driven development (BDD) possible.
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23
  • Behat Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-08-09

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Behat features and specs

  • Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) Support
    Behat is specifically designed for Behavior-Driven Development, enabling teams to write understandable and business-readable tests that facilitate a better understanding among developers, testers, and non-technical stakeholders.
  • Gherkin Language Integration
    It uses the Gherkin language which allows the creation of test scenarios that are easy to read and write. This makes it accessible for non-technical stakeholders to understand the tests.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    Behat has a strong community and a wide range of plugins and extensions available to enhance its functionality, such as Mink for browser automation and integrations with other tools.
  • PHP Compatibility
    As Behat is developed in PHP, it seamlessly integrates with PHP projects, making it a preferred choice for testing within the PHP ecosystem.
  • Encourages Collaboration
    By making test scenarios comprehensible to non-developers, Behat encourages collaboration between cross-functional teams, enhancing communication and shared understanding of project requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Behat

  • Steep Learning Curve
    There can be a significant learning curve for those unfamiliar with BDD concepts or the Gherkin language, requiring time and effort to master.
  • Limited to PHP Projects
    Behat is PHP-centric, which means its utility is predominantly for PHP applications. It might not be the best choice for projects written in other programming languages unless PHP is heavily involved.
  • Infrastructure Requirements
    Setting up Behat, especially with browser automation tools like Selenium via Mink, may require additional infrastructure and configurations which can be complex.
  • Execution Speed
    BDD-style tests with Behat can be slower to execute compared to unit tests, as they often involve more setup and teardown work in simulating user interactions.
  • Overhead for Small Projects
    The additional abstraction and ceremony provided by BDD tools like Behat may introduce unnecessary overhead for smaller projects where simpler testing methods might suffice.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

CrossBrowserTesting videos

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison โ€“ LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Behat videos

Behat for Beginners: Automated Testing in 5 Easy Steps

More videos:

  • Review - Making your life easier with Behat + Mink + Drupal Extension
  • Review - Lessons Learned from 2+ Years of Using Behat

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrossBrowserTesting and Behat)
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and Behat. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting should be more popular than Behat. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we donโ€™t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
  • How do yโ€™all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: over 5 years ago
View more

Behat mentions (4)

  • How to migrate from Api Platform v2 to v3?
    Before updating Api Platform, you should make sure that your Api Platform routes are fully covered by tests. You can define integration tests with PHPUnit, Behat or Pest, depending on the tool youโ€™re most comfortable with. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • PHPUnit, do i need to learn it?
    Behat: https://docs.behat.org/en/latest/ Following: Behaviour Driven Development. Source: over 3 years ago
  • How I added zero down deployment to my website
    ^ That's an example of the type of behavioral test I use. I use Behat (beha[vioral]t[est]) to run these, and it does so by opening a headless Chrome / Firefox and does the actual clicking through the real live website. Super useful to get set up - it's saved my bacon many times. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Parallel Behat
    TLDR; Our company dockerized pretty much everything, as such to tackle long waiting time of the CI pipeline, we split the big list of behat files into chunks and process it using docker in parallel using python multiprocessing. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CrossBrowserTesting and Behat, you can also consider the following products

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

WompMobile - WompMobile offers tow kind of functions โ€“ first creating new mobile apps and secondly converting the websites into mobile applications.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

OutSystems - Build Enterprise-Grade Apps Fast.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Oracle Mobile Application - Oracle Mobile Application framework or Oracle Mobile Application development platform is a hybrid mobile framework for rapidly developing single source applications for many platforms and devices.