Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CPPUnit VS EasyMock

Compare CPPUnit VS EasyMock and see what are their differences

CPPUnit logo CPPUnit

CppUnitย is the C++ port of the JUnit framework for unit testing.

EasyMock logo EasyMock

EasyMock provides dynamically generated Mock objects at runtime, without having to implement them.
  • CPPUnit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03
  • EasyMock Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

CPPUnit features and specs

  • Mature Framework
    CPPUnit is a well-established framework based on the xUnit architecture, which has been used for many years as the standard for C++ unit testing, offering robust and reliable testing capabilities.
  • Integration with Build Systems
    CPPUnit integrates well with popular build systems and IDEs, such as GNU Make and Visual Studio, facilitating streamlined build and test processes.
  • Extensive Documentation
    The framework has comprehensive documentation and community support, making it easier for developers to solve issues and understand its features.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    CPPUnit is available on multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing for consistent testing across different operating environments.

Possible disadvantages of CPPUnit

  • Limited Modern Features
    Compared to more recent testing frameworks, CPPUnit lacks some modern features such as lambda expressions and template-based testing, which can limit its flexibility.
  • Verbose Test Code
    Writing tests in CPPUnit can be verbose and cumbersome, requiring more boilerplate code compared to newer frameworks.
  • Declining Popularity
    As newer frameworks like Google Test have emerged, CPPUnit's popularity has declined, potentially leading to reduced community activity and fewer updates.
  • Complex Setup
    Initial setup and configuration of CPPUnit can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for developers who are new to the framework.

EasyMock features and specs

  • Easy to Use
    EasyMock provides a straightforward API for creating and using mock objects, making it simple for developers to write tests without extensive setup.
  • Minimal Configuration
    EasyMock requires minimal configuration as it automatically creates mock objects, reducing the overhead of manually writing mock implementations.
  • Integration with JUnit
    EasyMock seamlessly integrates with JUnit, allowing developers to write unit tests that leverage both frameworks' capabilities for comprehensive testing.
  • Strong Typing
    EasyMock provides strong typing for mock objects, which helps catch potential errors at compile time, leading to more reliable test code.
  • Support for Return Values and Exceptions
    EasyMock allows developers to specify return values and exceptions for mocked methods, providing flexibility in test scenarios.

Possible disadvantages of EasyMock

  • Limited Advanced Features
    EasyMock lacks some advanced features available in more modern mocking frameworks, which may limit its use in complex testing scenarios.
  • Static Method Mocking
    EasyMock does not natively support mocking static methods, which can be a limitation if testing requires interaction with such methods.
  • Learning Curve
    While EasyMock is generally user-friendly, new users still face a learning curve to understand mocking concepts and integrate the framework properly.
  • Compatibility Concerns
    Certain versions of EasyMock may face compatibility issues with newer versions of Java or other libraries, requiring careful consideration during upgrades.
  • Less Community Support
    Compared to other popular mocking frameworks like Mockito, EasyMock has less community support, which might make it harder to find solutions to specific issues.

CPPUnit videos

CS2103 - Setting up CppUnit with Visual Studio 2010

EasyMock videos

No EasyMock videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CPPUnit and EasyMock)
HR
62 62%
38% 38
Attendance Management Software
Automated Testing
66 66%
34% 34
HR Tools
62 62%
38% 38

User comments

Share your experience with using CPPUnit and EasyMock. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, EasyMock seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CPPUnit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CPPUnit yet. Tracking of CPPUnit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

EasyMock mentions (1)

  • Communication via Interface, Why?
    So if you don't know how to write unit tests, or how to use a mocking framework like https://easymock.org/ then you'll probably not find this principle very useful at all. That's okay. Just keep a note of it in the back of your mind, and then spend a few months writing unit tests for your code. At sound point, you'll find writing unit tests pretty painful, and that's probably where you'll discover mocking. Spend... Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CPPUnit and EasyMock, you can also consider the following products

SimpleTest - SimpleTestย is an open source unit test framework for the PHP programming language.

Google Test - Google Test is a unit testing for C++ programming language that is based on xUnit architecture.

Spock - Spock is leave / vacation tracker for Slack

UnitTest++ - Download JF Unittest for free. A C++ unittest framework, written out of frustration with the existing unittest frameworks out there. No GUI with colorful progress bars, no dependencies on any other package in the world.

Mockito - Mocking framework for unit tests in Java.

Toxiproxy - Toxiproxy is a framework for simulating network conditions to prove with tests that the application doesn't have single points of failure.