
Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Airtable
Creativity 365
RingCentral Video
Zoom
SquidHub
Plutio
Cppcheck
Microsoft TeamsCppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
s someone who works remotely, I've tried my fair share of collaboration apps. However, I have to say that Microsoft Teams has impressed me the most. It's a comprehensive app that brings together all the tools I need to communicate and collaborate with my colleagues seamlessly.
The interface of Microsoft Teams is user-friendly and easy to navigate. I particularly love the left-hand navigation bar that provides quick access to all the features, including chats, meetings, files, and activity. The app integrates with other Microsoft apps, such as Outlook and OneDrive, making it easier to schedule meetings and access files. The chat feature is simple, yet effective, with options to create groups, share files, and use emojis and GIFs.
Based on our record, Cppcheck seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Slack - A messaging app for teams who see through the Earth!
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Airtable - Airtable works like a spreadsheet but gives you the power of a database to organize anything. Sign up for free.
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.
Creativity 365 - Cross-device content creation suite