
Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
Flexera Software Vulnerability Manager
Pulse Secure
Tor Browser
StackPath
Avast
Castle
Sakurity
Signal Sciences
Cppcheck
Flexera Software Vulnerability ManagerCppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Flexera Software Vulnerability Manager is recommended for medium to large enterprises that require detailed vulnerability assessments, need to manage a wide range of software applications, and already have or plan to implement an integrated approach to IT management and security. It is particularly suitable for organizations with dedicated IT security teams who can leverage its in-depth features and analytics.
No Flexera Software Vulnerability Manager videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Cppcheck seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Pulse Secure - Pulse Secure provides a consolidated offering for access control, SSL VPN, and mobile device security. Contact Pulse Secure at 408-372-9600 to get a free demo.
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Tor Browser - Tor is free software for enabling anonymous communication.
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.
StackPath - Secure Content Delivery Network, DDoS, WAF Service