Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cppcheck VS Delve Debugger

Compare Cppcheck VS Delve Debugger and see what are their differences

Cppcheck logo Cppcheck

Cppcheck is an analysis tool for C/C++ code. It detects the types of bugs that the compilers normally fail to detect. The goal is no false positives. CppCheckDownload cppcheck for free.

Delve Debugger logo Delve Debugger

Delve is a debugger for the Go programming language.
  • Cppcheck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-13
  • Delve Debugger Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-27

Cppcheck features and specs

  • Open Source
    Cppcheck is open-source software, which means it is free to use and its source code is available for modification and distribution under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
  • Static Analysis
    Cppcheck excels at performing static code analysis, detecting bugs, memory leaks, and potential issues in C and C++ code without executing the program.
  • Wide Platform Support
    Cppcheck supports a wide range of platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it versatile and accessible to developers on different operating systems.
  • Integrated with IDEs
    Cppcheck can be integrated with popular Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) like Visual Studio, Eclipse, and Code::Blocks, providing seamless code analysis during development.
  • Customizable
    Cppcheck allows customization of its analysis through command-line options and configurations, enabling users to tailor the tool to their specific needs and project requirements.
  • Extensive Reporting
    Cppcheck provides detailed reports that highlight various types of issues, making it easier for developers to identify and resolve problems efficiently.
  • Regular Updates
    Cppcheck is actively maintained, with regular updates and improvements that enhance its capabilities and address any newly discovered issues.

Possible disadvantages of Cppcheck

  • False Positives
    Cppcheck may sometimes produce false positives, flagging issues that are not actually problematic, which can lead to unnecessary debugging efforts.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may encounter a learning curve when first using Cppcheck, as they need to understand its configuration options and how to interpret its output effectively.
  • Limited Dynamic Analysis
    Cppcheck focuses on static analysis and does not provide dynamic analysis capabilities, which means it cannot detect issues that only occur at runtime.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running Cppcheck on large codebases can introduce performance overhead, potentially slowing down the development process if not managed properly.
  • Complex Configuration
    For complex projects, configuring Cppcheck to ignore certain false positives or to focus on specific types of issues can be challenging and time-consuming.

Delve Debugger features and specs

  • Go-specific
    Delve is specifically designed for the Go programming language, providing insights and features that are tailored to Go's unique characteristics.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Delve offers a comprehensive set of debugging features, including breakpoints, call stacks, and variable inspection, making it a powerful tool for debugging Go applications.
  • Command Line Interface
    It provides a robust CLI, allowing developers to perform debugging tasks directly from the terminal, which can be more efficient for those who prefer command-line operations.
  • Integration with IDEs
    Delve integrates well with popular Go IDEs such as Visual Studio Code and GoLand, enhancing the debugging experience within these development environments.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Delve fosters community contributions and transparency, allowing developers to inspect the code and even contribute to its development.

Possible disadvantages of Delve Debugger

  • Learning Curve
    New users, especially those unfamiliar with command-line tools, may find Delve's extensive feature set and CLI interface challenging to learn initially.
  • Platform-dependent Issues
    Users might encounter platform-specific bugs or issues due to differences in how Delve interacts with operating system facilities across different environments.
  • Compatibility
    Changes in the Go language or runtime can sometimes lead to compatibility issues that require updates or patches to Delve.
  • Limited GUI
    Unlike some other debuggers that come with full-featured graphical interfaces, Delve primarily relies on CLI and integrations, which may not appeal to all users.

Analysis of Cppcheck

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Cppcheck is generally considered a good tool for developers and teams working with C/C++ codebases. It provides valuable insights into code quality and potential issues that could lead to bugs. Its configurability and active community support further enhance its usefulness in a development environment.

Why this product is good

  • Cppcheck is a static analysis tool for C/C++ code that helps identify bugs, undefined behavior, and non-compliance with coding standards. It is widely appreciated for its ability to catch a variety of issues during the development phase without executing the code. The tool is open source, actively maintained, and has a wide array of checks that can be configured to suit different project requirements.

Recommended for

    Cppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.

Cppcheck videos

Cppcheck

More videos:

  • Review - Daniel Marjamรคki: Cppcheck, static code analysis

Delve Debugger videos

No Delve Debugger videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cppcheck and Delve Debugger)
Code Analysis
92 92%
8% 8
Code Coverage
89 89%
11% 11
Code Review
88 88%
12% 12
Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Cppcheck and Delve Debugger. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cppcheck and Delve Debugger

Cppcheck Reviews

Top 9 C++ Static Code Analysis Tools
Cppcheck is a popular, open-source, free, cross-platform static code analysis tool dedicated to C and C++. It is known for being easy to use and its simplicity is one of its pros. To get started with it you donโ€™t have to do any adjustments or modifications, which is why itโ€™s often recommended for beginners. It also has a reputation of reporting a relatively small number of...

Delve Debugger Reviews

We have no reviews of Delve Debugger yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Delve Debugger might be a bit more popular than Cppcheck. We know about 14 links to it since March 2021 and only 10 links to Cppcheck. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cppcheck mentions (10)

  • Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint
    I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Enforcing Memory Safety?
    Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Static Code analysis
    For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How do you not shoot yourself in the foot ?
    Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Linting tool for prohibiting the use of specific std types
    Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Delve Debugger mentions (14)

  • Delve The Golang Debugger: A Deep Dive
    Delveโ€™s GitHub has setup details if you hit snags. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Mastering Golang Debugging in Emacs
    In this post I'll elaborate the powerful combination of Emacs, Delve, and dape. Together, these tools create a debugging experience that mimics (and often surpasses) traditional IDEs, while preserving the flexibility and extensibility that Emacs is famous for. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Vendoring, or go mod vendor: What Is It?
    Delve: A debugger for the Go programming language. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • The worst thing about Jenkins is that it works
    At a recent job, we had slightly different containers for local dev; our backend containers (for a Go app) had Air [1] installed for live reloading, plus Delve [2] running inside the container for VS Code's debugger to connect to. We also had a frontend container for local dev, which didn't get deployed as a container, just as static files. [1] https://github.com/cosmtrek/air. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Is there a neovim config with preconfigured debugger?
    So in my case I use https://github.com/leoluz/nvim-dap-go (which itself calls out to the CLI tool https://github.com/go-delve/delve). Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cppcheck and Delve Debugger, you can also consider the following products

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

UNICOM PurifyPlus - PurifyPlus is a run-time analysis tools for application reliability and performance.

Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...

Sublime Web Inspector - Sublime Web Inspector enables users to debug Javascript right in the Sublime Text editor.

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

PVS-Studio - PVS-Studio is a useful piece of software for detecting problems in source code. The software examines program codes written in C, C++, and C# for any problems that might prohibit the code from functioning properly.