Cppcheck VS Codacy

Cppcheck Reviews

Codacy Reviews

Cppcheck mentions (10)

• Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint

  I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Enforcing Memory Safety?

  Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: 11 months ago

• Static Code analysis

  For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 1 year ago

• How do you not shoot yourself in the foot ?

  Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 1 year ago

• Linting tool for prohibiting the use of specific std types

  Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 1 year ago

Codacy mentions (4)

• What is the best way to set a cookie (without setcookie?)

  I'm trying to use Codacy to review my code. One of the issues is regarding the use of the "setcookie" function. Source: over 2 years ago

• Converting vstest coverage files in github actions?

  Does anyone have an example on how to get this conversion done on github actions where I can convert the *.coverage file into a *.xml file for uploading to codacy.com. Source: almost 3 years ago

• PHP Static Analysis Tools Review

  Online analysisFinally, if you want a simple way to analyze your code without having to manually configure everything locally, you can use an online code review service such as Codacy (shameless plug here). We already integrate some of the mentioned detection tools in this article and we are working every day to improve the service. The other main benefit of using automated code review tools is to allow you to... - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

• Top 10 ways to perform fast code reviews

  Because you care and because you always want to be better, automation is a great way to optimize your review workflow process. Go ahead and do a quick search on Google for automated code reviews and see who better fits your workflow. You'll find Codacy on your Google search and we hope you like what we do. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago