Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Control-M VS StackStorm

Compare Control-M VS StackStorm and see what are their differences

Control-M logo Control-M

Controlโ€‘M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

StackStorm logo StackStorm

StackStorm is a powerful open-source automation platform that wires together all of your apps...
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12
  • StackStorm Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27

Control-M features and specs

  • Comprehensive Job Scheduling
    Control-M provides an extensive range of job scheduling capabilities, supporting various environments and platforms, which ensures that all workflows and batch jobs can be managed consistently and efficiently.
  • Ease of Use
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for both technical and non-technical users to manage job workflows without extensive training.
  • Scalability
    Control-M scales effortlessly, accommodating the needs of small businesses to large enterprises, without compromising on performance.
  • Integrations
    It seamlessly integrates with numerous applications and technologies, including cloud services, databases, ERP systems, and more, which makes it versatile across different IT landscapes.
  • Advanced Automation Features
    Provides advanced automation capabilities such as predictive analytics, machine learning, and DR capabilities that enhance efficiency and reduce manual intervention.
  • Robust Reporting
    Offers powerful reporting tools and dashboards that provide actionable insights and visibility into job performance and system health.

Possible disadvantages of Control-M

  • Cost
    The comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities come at a high cost, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    The initial installation and configuration can be complex and require significant investment in time and resources to set up properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the depth and breadth of features can result in a steep learning curve for new users, necessitating substantial training.
  • Resource Intensive
    Control-M can be resource-intensive, requiring considerable computing resources to run efficiently, which might be a constraint for organizations with limited IT infrastructure.
  • Dependency on Vendor Support
    While support is robust, the complexity of the system can sometimes necessitate frequent interaction with vendor support, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While the tool is highly configurable, extensive customization can become complicated and may require professional services or advanced knowledge.

StackStorm features and specs

  • Open Source
    StackStorm is an open-source automation platform, which means it is cost-effective as there are no licensing fees. Users can contribute to its development and customization.
  • Event-Driven Automation
    It supports event-driven automation, allowing users to automate complex workflows that can be triggered by events from numerous sources.
  • Flexible and Extensible
    StackStorm provides a high level of flexibility and extensibility through integrations and customizable actions, allowing it to fit various automation needs.
  • Active Community
    There is an active community supporting StackStorm, which can be beneficial for troubleshooting, sharing best practices, and seeking advice from other users.
  • Self-Service Automation
    With its GUI and command-line tools, StackStorm enables self-service automation, empowering users to initiate and manage automation tasks without deep technical expertise.

Possible disadvantages of StackStorm

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup and configuration of StackStorm can be complex and time-consuming, requiring a good understanding of the system and its dependencies.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    Users may experience a steep learning curve due to the wide range of features and the requirement for understanding underlying technologies like Python and YAML.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies and ensuring compatibility between different integrations and components can be challenging and require continual maintenance.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running StackStorm can be resource-intensive, which might require additional infrastructure or cloud resources, especially for large-scale deployments.
  • Limited Support
    While there is a community for support, professional support options may be limited compared to proprietary solutions, which might be a concern for enterprises needing guaranteed, reliable support.

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

StackStorm videos

StackStorm 101 (v0.12)

More videos:

  • Review - Recovery from OpenStack Failures using Nagios and StackStorm

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Control-M and StackStorm)
IT Automation
89 89%
11% 11
Automation
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Workflow Automation
73 73%
27% 27

User comments

Share your experience with using Control-M and StackStorm. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Control-M and StackStorm

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in โ€™23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

StackStorm Reviews

We have no reviews of StackStorm yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Control-M and StackStorm, you can also consider the following products

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

Apache Airflow - Airflow is a platform to programmaticaly author, schedule and monitor data pipelines.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

RunDeck - RunDeck is an open source automation service with a web console, command line tools and a WebAPI.

Lastpass - LastPass is an online password manager and form filler that makes web browsing easier and more secure.

ifttt - IFTTT puts the internet to work for you. Create simple connections between the products you use every day.