Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Control-M VS IBM Workload Automation

Compare Control-M VS IBM Workload Automation and see what are their differences

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

IBM Workload Automation logo IBM Workload Automation

IBM Workload Automation helps increase productivity and governance of enterprise business workloads with hybrid automation and applied analytics.
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12
  • IBM Workload Automation Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-28

Control-M features and specs

  • Comprehensive Job Scheduling
    Control-M provides an extensive range of job scheduling capabilities, supporting various environments and platforms, which ensures that all workflows and batch jobs can be managed consistently and efficiently.
  • Ease of Use
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for both technical and non-technical users to manage job workflows without extensive training.
  • Scalability
    Control-M scales effortlessly, accommodating the needs of small businesses to large enterprises, without compromising on performance.
  • Integrations
    It seamlessly integrates with numerous applications and technologies, including cloud services, databases, ERP systems, and more, which makes it versatile across different IT landscapes.
  • Advanced Automation Features
    Provides advanced automation capabilities such as predictive analytics, machine learning, and DR capabilities that enhance efficiency and reduce manual intervention.
  • Robust Reporting
    Offers powerful reporting tools and dashboards that provide actionable insights and visibility into job performance and system health.

Possible disadvantages of Control-M

  • Cost
    The comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities come at a high cost, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    The initial installation and configuration can be complex and require significant investment in time and resources to set up properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the depth and breadth of features can result in a steep learning curve for new users, necessitating substantial training.
  • Resource Intensive
    Control-M can be resource-intensive, requiring considerable computing resources to run efficiently, which might be a constraint for organizations with limited IT infrastructure.
  • Dependency on Vendor Support
    While support is robust, the complexity of the system can sometimes necessitate frequent interaction with vendor support, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While the tool is highly configurable, extensive customization can become complicated and may require professional services or advanced knowledge.

IBM Workload Automation features and specs

  • Comprehensive Automation
    IBM Workload Automation provides a wide range of automation capabilities across different platforms and environments, which can simplify complex workflows and improve operational efficiency.
  • Scalability
    The software supports scalability, allowing businesses to grow and manage workflows efficiently as their needs and operations expand.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It offers strong integration capabilities with various applications, cloud environments, and IT infrastructure, facilitating seamless workflow management across different systems.
  • Improved Efficiency
    By automating repetitive tasks and processes, it reduces manual intervention, thereby improving operational efficiency and reducing the risk of human error.
  • Advanced Scheduling
    The solution provides robust scheduling features which allow precise control over the execution of workflows, including dependency management and triggering based on complex conditions.

Possible disadvantages of IBM Workload Automation

  • Complexity
    The extensive features and configuration options might result in a steep learning curve, especially for organizations that are new to workload automation tools.
  • Cost
    IBM Workload Automation can be expensive, which might be a constraint for smaller businesses or those with limited budgets.
  • Resource Intensive
    The system may require significant IT resources and expertise to deploy and maintain effectively, potentially straining smaller IT departments.
  • Customization Challenges
    While highly customizable, tailoring the solution to fit specific business needs might require substantial time and expertise.
  • Dependence on IBM Support
    Businesses might become reliant on IBM’s customer support for troubleshooting and complex implementations, which can lead to delays if support is not timely or efficient.

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

IBM Workload Automation videos

IBM Workload Automation Roadmap and Strategy Update

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Control-M and IBM Workload Automation)
IT Automation
71 71%
29% 29
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Workflow Automation
71 71%
29% 29
Product Deployment
62 62%
38% 38

User comments

Share your experience with using Control-M and IBM Workload Automation. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Control-M and IBM Workload Automation

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

IBM Workload Automation Reviews

9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: IBM Workload Automation has been designed to simplify business, operational, and IT workflows. It is also capable of orchestrating event-driven and unattended workloads. Its user-friendly interface provides graphical views and embedded analytics that allow users to make data-driven decisions.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Control-M and IBM Workload Automation, you can also consider the following products

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

Stonebranch - Stonebranch builds IT orchestration and automation solutions that transform business IT environments from simple IT task automation into sophisticated, real-time business service automation.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

ActiveBatch - Orchestrate the entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation & Job Scheduling. Build and manage workflows from one place.

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions

JAMS Scheduler - Enterprise workload automation software supporting processes on Windows, Linux, UNIX, iSeries, SAP, Oracle, SQL, ERPs and more.