Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Contributions for GitHub VS codebeat

Compare Contributions for GitHub VS codebeat and see what are their differences

Contributions for GitHub logo Contributions for GitHub

Show your GitHub contributions graph on your iOS Devices

codebeat logo codebeat

Automated code review for Swift
  • Contributions for GitHub Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04
  • codebeat Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-11-28

Contributions for GitHub features and specs

  • User Engagement
    The app enhances user engagement by allowing developers to track and visualize their GitHub contributions directly from their iOS devices. This provides a convenient way to remain productive and motivated.
  • Convenience
    Offers a mobile-friendly interface to monitor GitHub activity, making it easy to check contributions on the go without needing to access a computer.
  • Motivational Tracking
    The app visualizes contribution data in a way that can motivate users to maintain or increase their activity levels on GitHub.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, the app allows users to contribute to its development, customize it for personal use, or learn from its codebase.

Possible disadvantages of Contributions for GitHub

  • Limited Functionality
    The app may not offer the full range of features available on the GitHub web interface, which could limit its usefulness for more in-depth repository management tasks.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Users need to log in with their GitHub credentials, which could raise privacy concerns if the app's handling of this data is not transparent or well-secured.
  • iOS Exclusivity
    Since it's only available on iOS, Android users or those preferring cross-platform apps are unable to use it, limiting its potential audience.
  • Dependency on GitHub API
    The app may experience limitations or issues related to changes in the GitHub API, potentially affecting its reliability and functionality.

codebeat features and specs

  • Automated Code Review
    Codebeat automates the code review process, providing instant feedback on code quality, which can significantly reduce the time developers spend on manual reviews.
  • Multi-Language Support
    Supports numerous programming languages including Python, Ruby, Java, and JavaScript, making it versatile for teams working on multi-language projects.
  • Integration
    Codebeat offers seamless integration with popular development tools like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, making it easy to incorporate into existing workflows.
  • Code Quality Metrics
    Provides comprehensive metrics like code complexity, duplication, and maintainability, helping teams identify and address potential issues early.
  • Team Collaboration
    Facilitates team collaboration by allowing team members to share insights and feedback on code quality directly within the platform.

Possible disadvantages of codebeat

  • Cost
    Pricing could be a concern for smaller teams or individual developers, as it is a paid service after the free trial period.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might experience a learning curve when first starting with the platform due to its comprehensive set of features and metrics.
  • Dependency Analysis
    While Codebeat provides substantial code quality analysis, it lacks in-depth dependency analysis compared to some other tools.
  • Customization
    Limited customization options for setting up specific rules or adjustments based on project-specific requirements or coding standards.
  • Lag in Updates
    Occasional delays in updates and support for new programming languages or frameworks, which can be a drawback for cutting-edge projects.

Contributions for GitHub videos

No Contributions for GitHub videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

codebeat videos

codebeat - Product Demo

More videos:

  • Review - codebeat is an automated code review tool for the web and mobile
  • Review - codebeat

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Contributions for GitHub and codebeat)
Developer Tools
43 43%
57% 57
Code Coverage
0 0%
100% 100
Web App
100 100%
0% 0
GitHub
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Contributions for GitHub and codebeat. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, codebeat seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Contributions for GitHub mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Contributions for GitHub yet. Tracking of Contributions for GitHub recommendations started around Mar 2021.

codebeat mentions (2)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Contributions for GitHub and codebeat, you can also consider the following products

GitHub Metrics - Customize your profile with various plugins and metrics

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

GitHub Contributions - All your GitHub contributions in one image

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

GitWrapped - View/Share how you contributed to Github over the years

Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review