Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Continuous Integration and Delivery VS k3s

Compare Continuous Integration and Delivery VS k3s and see what are their differences

This page does not exist

Continuous Integration and Delivery logo Continuous Integration and Delivery

CI is a practice that makes preparing for a release easier. CD may refer to "delivery" or "deployment," which are similar but not quite the same.

k3s logo k3s

K3s is a lightweight Kubernetes distribution by Rancher Labs intended for IoT, Edge, and cloud deployments.
  • Continuous Integration and Delivery Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03
  • k3s Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-09

Continuous Integration and Delivery features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

k3s features and specs

  • Lightweight
    K3s is designed to be lightweight and less resource-intensive compared to full Kubernetes distributions, making it ideal for edge and IoT devices, as well as development environments.
  • Easy Installation
    K3s provides a simple installation process, requiring only a single binary for installation, which simplifies the setup procedure for users.
  • Low Resource Usage
    By stripping away non-essential features, K3s consumes significantly fewer resources, lowering the barrier to entry for running Kubernetes on resource-constrained environments.
  • Fully CNCF Conformant
    K3s is certified by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) as conformant with standard Kubernetes, meaning it follows the same API and operational model.
  • Built-In Database
    K3s includes an embedded SQLite database by default, which simplifies deployment and reduces the complexity associated with managing an external etcd cluster.
  • Automated TLS Management
    K3s has integrated support for TLS certificates management, which helps in ensuring secure communications between components without additional configuration.
  • Ecosystem Compatibility
    K3s supports popular Kubernetes add-ons and CI/CD tools, so it can be seamlessly integrated into existing Kubernetes-based workflows.

Possible disadvantages of k3s

  • Reduced Feature Set
    To keep K3s lightweight, some non-essential Kubernetes features and components are omitted or replaced, which might limit functionality for more advanced use cases.
  • Lack of Scalability
    K3s is optimized for smaller clusters and edge environments, so it may not scale as efficiently as standard Kubernetes distributions in large, enterprise-level deployments.
  • Embedded SQLite Limitations
    While the built-in SQLite database simplifies initial setup, it may not handle high write loads or offer the same reliability and performance as an external etcd cluster for production environments.
  • Community and Enterprise Support
    Although supported by the Kubernetes community, K3s may have less enterprise-grade support and fewer educational resources compared to other full-featured Kubernetes distributions.
  • Ecosystem Integration
    Certain Kubernetes tools or cloud services optimized for full Kubernetes distributions may not work seamlessly with K3s, requiring custom configurations or workarounds.
  • Limited Networking Options
    K3s might have fewer networking configuration options compared to full-featured Kubernetes implementations, potentially restricting advanced network setup.
  • Simplified Security Model
    K3s implements a simplified security model which might lack some advanced security features and policies found in the standard Kubernetes distribution.

Continuous Integration and Delivery videos

No Continuous Integration and Delivery videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

k3s videos

Siroko K3s Sun Glasses Unboxing and Review | Big Muscle Gains

More videos:

  • Review - Elecraft K3S Transceiver Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Continuous Integration and Delivery and k3s)
Continuous Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
DevOps Tools
9 9%
91% 91
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Continuous Integration and Delivery and k3s. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, k3s seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 179 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Continuous Integration and Delivery mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Continuous Integration and Delivery yet. Tracking of Continuous Integration and Delivery recommendations started around Mar 2021.

k3s mentions (179)

  • OTEL Observability with Langfuse for Strands Agents
    I am using K3S for launching a single node kubernetes cluster. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Kubernetes Overview: Container Orchestration & Cloud-Native
    Yes, tools like Minikube, kind, and k3s create single-node clusters for development and testing. However, production Kubernetes is designed for distributed environments. Single-node deployments forfeit high availability, scalability, and fault tolerance benefits that justify Kubernetes complexity. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Setting up a Docker Hub pull-through cache with Tigris
    A server with Docker and Docker Compose installed Or a Kubernetes cluster with HTTP ingress set up (such as with k3s and Traefik). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • What Would a Kubernetes 2.0 Look Like
    > I'd want k8s-lite, that was more opinionated and less flexible You seem to want something like https://skateco.github.io/ (still compatible to k8s manifests). Or maybe even something like https://uncloud.run/ Or if you still want real certified Kubernetes, but small, there is https://k3s.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Scaling Spin Apps With KEDA
    Setting up the Kubernetes cluster and the AWS SQS queue is outside the scope of this article, but you can deploy an Amazon EKS cluster by following this guide, or use k3s as a lightweight, local alternative. For setting up an SQS queue, refer to this tutorial. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Continuous Integration and Delivery and k3s, you can also consider the following products

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Kubernetes - Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers

Harvest - Simple time tracking, fast online invoicing, and powerful reporting software. Simplify employee timesheets and billing. Get started for free.

Kind - Kind is a web-based tool that provides you the features to operate the local kubernetes clusters with the help of a docker container named nodes.

Harness - Automated Tests For Your Web App

k3sup - from Zero to KUBECONFIG in < 1 min ๐Ÿš€. Contribute to alexellis/k3sup development by creating an account on GitHub.