Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Kind VS Continuous Integration and Delivery

Compare Kind VS Continuous Integration and Delivery and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Kind logo Kind

Kind is a web-based tool that provides you the features to operate the local kubernetes clusters with the help of a docker container named nodes.

Continuous Integration and Delivery logo Continuous Integration and Delivery

CI is a practice that makes preparing for a release easier. CD may refer to "delivery" or "deployment," which are similar but not quite the same.
  • Kind Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-11
  • Continuous Integration and Delivery Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Kind features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Kind is relatively easy to set up and use, making it a good tool for developers who want to quickly test Kubernetes clusters locally.
  • Lightweight
    Since Kind operates with Docker containers to simulate Kubernetes nodes, it is lightweight and consumes fewer resources than using virtual machines.
  • Compatibility
    Kind supports the latest versions of Kubernetes, enabling developers to test the newest features in a local environment before deploying to production.
  • CI/CD Integration
    Kind can be easily integrated into CI/CD pipelines, allowing developers to automate testing of Kubernetes deployments in a controlled local environment.
  • Isolation
    Because it uses containers, Kind allows for isolated Kubernetes environments which can be useful for testing without affecting live deployments.

Possible disadvantages of Kind

  • Performance
    Being a containerized solution, it might not offer the same performance level as a cluster running on physical or virtual machines.
  • Single-node Setup Limitation
    Though Kind can simulate multi-node clusters, all nodes are still hosted on the same physical machine, which may not accurately mimic a distributed production environment.
  • Networking Limitations
    Kind can have limitations with complex networking setups, which may not fully reproduce the complexities of a real-world Kubernetes cluster.
  • Resource Limitations
    Depending on the host machine's specifications, Kind might be limited in the scale it can simulate, which could be restrictive for testing large-scale applications.
  • Docker Dependency
    Since Kind relies on Docker to run Kubernetes nodes, it requires Docker to be installed and running, which may not be ideal for all development environments.

Continuous Integration and Delivery features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of Kind

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Kind is considered a good tool for local Kubernetes cluster management, particularly for development and testing purposes.

Why this product is good

  • Kind (kind.sigs.k8s.io) is a tool for running local Kubernetes clusters using Docker container 'nodes'. It is well-regarded because it is lightweight, easy to set up, and perfect for local development and testing of Kubernetes applications. Kind supports multi-node clusters and is widely used by developers to simulate real Kubernetes environments on their local machines. Additionally, it is open source and maintained by the Kubernetes SIGs community, ensuring it receives regular updates and support.

Recommended for

  • Developers needing to test Kubernetes applications locally
  • CI/CD pipeline testing that requires ephemeral Kubernetes clusters
  • Educators and learners needing an easy setup for Kubernetes experimentation
  • Anyone looking for a lightweight and flexible Kubernetes environment without requiring a full-scale cloud deployment

Kind videos

+ Add

Swans - To Be Kind ALBUM REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - Kind LED X420 LED Grow Light Review

Continuous Integration and Delivery videos

No Continuous Integration and Delivery videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Kind and Continuous Integration and Delivery)

Kind

Continuous Integration and Delivery

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
DevOps Tools
82 82%
DevOps Tools
18% 18
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
Continuous Integration
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Kind and Continuous Integration and Delivery. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Kind seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 109 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Kind mentions (109)

  • From Black Box to Observable: Deploying ToolHive with OTel + Prometheus in Kubernetes
    A Kubernetes cluster: Any cluster will do. For this tutorial, we're using a local cluster created with kind. - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
  • From Theory to Practice: A Complete Guide to Kubernetes In-Place Pod Resizing
    KinD: This enables you to create a local cluster, and more specifically, you can specify the version of Kubernetes you’d like to run. - Source: dev.to / 24 days ago
  • Geek's Guide to Kubernetes Image Credential Provider Plugins: No Bloat
    I spent more than 8 hours wrestling with Kubernetes image credential provider plugins before finally stumbling upon the real solution. If you think this is as simple as dropping a config into Kind or Minikube think again. It doesn’t work that way, and I’d rather save you the wasted time I went through. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Kubernetes Overview: Container Orchestration & Cloud-Native
    Yes, tools like Minikube, kind, and k3s create single-node clusters for development and testing. However, production Kubernetes is designed for distributed environments. Single-node deployments forfeit high availability, scalability, and fault tolerance benefits that justify Kubernetes complexity. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Proxmox VMs, Kairos, Kubernetes automation
    I needed a test bed for dumping all my wacky tools, horrible spaghetti code, and other OSS nonsense. Yes, I could use kind (https://kind.sigs.k8s.io/) on my own computer, but that would defeat some of the purpose of the things I'm doing: testing production-like environments, testing multi-node cluster things, testing for longer-term viability etc. Kind could probably do all these things, but where's the fun in... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

Continuous Integration and Delivery mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Continuous Integration and Delivery yet. Tracking of Continuous Integration and Delivery recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Kind and Continuous Integration and Delivery, you can also consider the following products

k3s - K3s is a lightweight Kubernetes distribution by Rancher Labs intended for IoT, Edge, and cloud deployments.

minikube - Run Kubernetes locally. Contribute to kubernetes/minikube development by creating an account on GitHub.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Kubernetes - Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers

Harvest - Simple time tracking, fast online invoicing, and powerful reporting software. Simplify employee timesheets and billing. Get started for free.

Helm.sh - The Kubernetes Package Manager

Loading...