Composer
jQuery
React Native
Babel
OpenSSL
Raven.js
Symfony
jQuery UI
Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
Composer
CppcheckCppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Based on our record, Composer seems to be a lot more popular than Cppcheck. While we know about 152 links to Composer, we've tracked only 10 mentions of Cppcheck. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
It's very confusing that they use the same name as the very well known PHP package manager, composer https://getcomposer.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
I'm embarrassed I never took the time to understand Composer until now. I have been preaching for a long time to start each PHP project with Composer, even when the project is not going end up on Packagist. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Waaseyaa is a monorepo. The root composer.json defines 43 subpackages under packages/, each referenced as a path repository with @dev constraints. During development, this is convenient. Composer resolves everything locally, and you never think about versioning. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
(P)NPM is an outlier in this behavior compared to package managers of other languages. With package managers like Composer (PHP), pip (Python) and NuGet (.NET) dependencies are by default peer dependencies. That means that in those package managers it is not possible to have multiple versions of the same dependency in your application1. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Download from getcomposer.org and follow installation instructions. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
React Native - A framework for building native apps with React
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Babel - Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.