Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CompliAPI VS CGPulse

Compare CompliAPI VS CGPulse and see what are their differences

CompliAPI logo CompliAPI

Screen crypto addresses, emails, websites, government IDs and countries against OFAC and 10+ global lists in real time, plus geo-fencing and VPN detection — one API key, one GET request.

CGPulse logo CGPulse

Scan Azure and AWS resources against 621 policy rules. Auto-remediate findings, track compliance frameworks, integrate via API.
Visit Website
Not present
  • CGPulse
    Image date //
    2026-04-24
  • CGPulse
    Image date //
    2026-04-24
  • CGPulse
    Image date //
    2026-04-24
  • CGPulse
    Image date //
    2026-04-24

CGPulse is a multi-cloud governance platform for DevOps, security, and compliance teams managing Azure and AWS environments. It was built for the gap between enterprise CSPM platforms priced in five figures per year and free open-source scanners that leave you without workflow, ownership, or remediation tooling.

The platform continuously scans cloud resources against 621 policy rules - 305 Azure, 175 AWS, 16 cross-cloud, and 95+ organizational controls - mapped to 19 compliance frameworks: SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, CIS v8, CIS AWS v3, FedRAMP, NIST CSF, and ten more. Findings are surfaced with evidence trails, severity, and actionable remediation copy.

Key capabilities:

  • One-click auto-remediation for supported Azure and AWS misconfigurations
  • Infrastructure-as-code export: Terraform and Bicep templates generated from findings
  • Scheduled scans: daily, weekly, monthly, or hourly on Business tier
  • REST API with 26 endpoints for CI/CD pipeline integration
  • Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for AI assistants - Claude Code, Copilot, and any MCP client can run scans, read results, and trigger fixes
  • Role-based access control: Owner, Admin, Contributor, Viewer
  • PDF compliance reports for audit evidence
  • External database sync to push scan snapshots into customer-owned Cosmos DB
  • Custom rule authoring via YAML editor

Pricing starts free for a single Azure plus single AWS account; paid Team is €99/month and Business is €299/month with self-serve Stripe checkout. Onboarding takes about 60 seconds - connect cloud accounts via OIDC and first scan runs immediately.

CompliAPI features and specs

  • API-driven compliance automation
    CompliAPI appears to offer programmatic access to compliance checks and workflows, allowing developers to integrate compliance verification directly into their applications without manual processes.
  • Time savings for developers
    By providing pre-built compliance logic through an API, it can reduce the engineering time needed to build and maintain compliance-related features in-house.
  • Scalability
    API-based solutions typically scale well with business growth, allowing companies to handle increasing volumes of compliance checks without significant additional overhead.
  • Standardization
    Using a dedicated compliance API can help ensure consistent application of compliance rules across different products, teams, or regions within an organization.
  • Faster integration
    Well-documented APIs generally allow for quicker integration into existing tech stacks compared to building custom compliance solutions from scratch.

Possible disadvantages of CompliAPI

  • Limited public information
    There is relatively little publicly available detailed information about CompliAPI's specific features, pricing, and customer reviews, making it harder to fully evaluate the service before committing.
  • Dependency on third-party service
    Relying on an external API for compliance functions introduces a dependency risk; any downtime, pricing changes, or discontinuation of the service could impact business operations.
  • Potential integration complexity
    Despite being an API, integrating compliance logic into existing systems can still require significant technical effort, especially for complex or highly regulated industries.
  • Compliance coverage limitations
    The API may not cover all the specific regulatory requirements relevant to every industry or jurisdiction, potentially requiring supplementary manual compliance processes.
  • Data privacy and security concerns
    Sending compliance-related data to a third-party API raises questions about data security, privacy protections, and how sensitive information is stored or processed.

CGPulse features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of CGPulse

Overall verdict

  • I don't have verified information about CGPulse (cloudgovernancepulse.com) as it appears to be a niche or possibly new product/service that isn't well-documented in my training data. I cannot provide an accurate assessment without risking giving you false information.

Why this product is good

  • I don't have reliable data on this specific product's features, pricing, or performance
  • I cannot verify claims about cloud governance capabilities without confirmed sources
  • Providing fabricated details would be misleading and potentially harmful for your decision-making

Recommended for

  • Unable to determine without verified product information
  • Recommend checking the official website directly for features and pricing
  • Consider looking for independent reviews on platforms like G2, Capterra, or Gartner Peer Insights
  • Reach out to their sales team for a demo and to ask specific questions about your use case
  • Check if they offer a free trial to test the product yourself

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CompliAPI and CGPulse)
Compliance
100 100%
0% 0
Cyber Security
0 0%
100% 100
Anti-Money Laundering (AML)
Cloud Services
0 0%
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing CompliAPI and CGPulse.

What makes your product unique?

CGPulse's answer:

Three things. First, an MCP server. Claude or any MCP client can run compliance scans, read findings, and trigger auto-remediation through natural language. No other CSPM ships this. Second, public self-serve pricing (€99/€299/month, Stripe checkout, no demo required) in a category where the norm is six-figure enterprise contracts. Third, every finding ships with Terraform and Bicep templates so teams apply fixes through their own change management, not a vendor UI.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

CGPulse's answer:

Price and speed to value. Wiz, Prisma Cloud, Orca typically start at $50k/year with six-week rollouts and sales gatekeepers. CGPulse is €99 to €299 per month with public pricing and a 60-second self-serve onboarding. You get 621 policy rules across 19 compliance frameworks (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, CIS v8), the same category coverage, without enterprise overhead. For teams preparing their first audit, that's the difference between starting this quarter or next year.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

CGPulse's answer:

Small and mid-size DevOps and platform teams, typically 10 to 200 people, running production workloads on Azure and AWS. Often they're preparing for their first SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audit, or their first customer security review. Many have tried open-source scanners (Prowler, ScoutSuite) and found the detection useful but the workflow missing. Others have been quoted by enterprise CSPM and found it outside their budget. CGPulse is built for the gap between those two.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

CGPulse's answer:

.NET 10 with Blazor Server for the portal. Azure Cosmos DB for tenant and scan data, Azure App Service plus Azure Functions for the backend, Azure Service Bus for scan orchestration. Cloud scanning uses the Azure ARM SDK and AWS SDK directly. No agents, no proxies. Stripe for subscription billing. MCP server built on the ModelContextProtocol.AspNetCore library. Hosted entirely in Azure North Europe with per-tenant Cosmos partition keys.

What's the story behind your product?

CGPulse's answer:

It started a year ago with a simple wish: one clear view of what was actually running across my Azure and AWS accounts. Not console-hopping, a real map. Once the map was working, the obvious next layer was security. Not "here's a VM" but "here's a VM and here's what's wrong with it".

What I kept wishing for was honest answers with honest fixes. Not a red light on a dashboard, but guidance you can act on. Real automation where it's safe, and clear "do this, then this" steps where it isn't.

So a small scanner became a rule engine. Rules became compliance frameworks. Findings grew actual Terraform, Bicep, and CLI you can run. Then AWS support landed on top.

CGPulse today is a multi-cloud governance platform built around three promises: Connect, Govern, Protect. Connect your Azure and AWS accounts and see every resource in one view. Govern with 621 policy rules across 19 compliance frameworks. Protect with auto-remediation where it's safe and IaC export where the change needs human review.

User comments

Share your experience with using CompliAPI and CGPulse. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CompliAPI and CGPulse, you can also consider the following products

LexFlag - Automated risk assessment software that screens vendors, suppliers, and third parties against global risk databases. AI-powered entity analysis for every risk dimension.

Wiz - The leading cloud infrastructure security platform that enables organizations to rapidly identify and remove the most pressing risks in the cloud.

sanctions.io - Sanctions & AML screening made simple

Lacework - Lacework is a highly trusted platform that provides security for Cloud Environments, DevOps, and Containers.

AML Wizard - Your overall compliance partner

Aqua Security - Aqua Security provides a security solution for virtual containers.