Software Alternatives & Startups

Commit Together by Github VS Speed-Check

Compare Commit Together by Github VS Speed-Check and see what are their differences

Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

Rating
0 reviews
Speed-Check

Speed-Check is a free, privacy-first browser speed test measuring download, upload, ping, and jitter via M-Lab NDT7 — no signup, no tracking, no app required.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Free Free trial

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Commit Together by Github seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
1 vs 0
Developer Tools popularity
69% vs 31%
alternatives listed
73 vs 72

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Commit Together by Github
Speed-Check
Website github.blog speed-check.net
Pricing —
Free Free trial Official pricing
Platforms —
MacOS Windows Google Chrome Firefox Safari Edge Brave Opera Linux iOS Android Chrome OS +9
Company — Startup from Germany · 1 - 9 employees · 2025
Listed in

About Commit Together by Github and Speed-Check

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Commit Together by Github
Speed-Check

No description of Commit Together by Github yet.

Speed-Check is a free, open, and privacy-first internet speed test that measures your download speed, upload speed, ping, and jitter directly in your browser — no signup, no app install, and no tracking of personal data. Unlike most mainstream speed tests, Speed-Check runs on the M-Lab NDT7...

Read more about Speed-Check

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Commit Together by Github 4 features
Speed-Check 8 features
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.
  • Measurement protocol
    M-Lab NDT7 (same protocol Google uses) + Cloudflare endpoints
  • Metrics measured
    Download, Upload, Ping, Jitter (all shown by default)
  • Account required
    No — fully anonymous, no signup
  • Privacy
    No personal data stored, no tracking cookies, GDPR-compliant
  • Pricing
    100% free, no premium tier
  • Embeddable widget
    Free, customizable (colors/theme), 3 sizes (compact, full, gauge)
  • Browser extensions
    Chrome (Manifest V3) + Firefox (140+)
  • PWA support
    Installable on desktop & mobile, offline fallback page

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Commit Together by Github
Speed-Check

No analysis of Commit Together by Github yet.

Overall verdict

  • Speed-Check.net is a simple, no-frills internet speed testing tool that provides quick and accessible measurements of download, upload, and ping speeds without requiring installation or account creation.

Why this product is good

  • Free and easy to use with no signup required
  • Provides quick results for download, upload, and ping speeds
  • Accessible directly from a web browser on multiple devices
  • Lightweight interface that doesn't require heavy bandwidth to run the test itself
  • Useful for basic troubleshooting of internet connectivity issues

Recommended for

  • Casual users wanting a quick check of their internet speed
  • People troubleshooting basic connectivity issues at home
  • Users who prefer a simple, ad-light testing experience
  • Those who don't need advanced diagnostics or detailed historical data tracking

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Commit Together by Github
Speed-Check
69% 69%
31% 31%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Commit Together by Github and Speed-Check.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Speed-Check's answer:

Privacy-conscious internet users, remote workers, gamers, and streamers who want a fast, accurate, no-nonsense speed test — plus webmasters, bloggers, and ISPs looking for a free, embeddable widget. Secondary audiences include journalists and researchers who use the global country rankings and the open M-Lab methodology for citations.

What makes your product unique?

Speed-Check's answer:

Speed-Check is an open-source, privacy-first internet speed test built on the M-Lab NDT7 protocol (the same standard Google uses) combined with Cloudflare endpoints. Unlike most competitors, it requires no account, stores no personal data on public pages, runs only a single light ad placement, and offers a completely free embeddable widget — features that are paywalled or hidden elsewhere. It also ships with dedicated Chrome and Firefox extensions, a PWA install option, and detailed country-level rankings, glossaries, and guides.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Speed-Check's answer:

Because it combines accuracy with transparency: M-Lab NDT7 results within 2–5% of Ookla, but without the heavy ads, tracking, video pre-rolls, or mandatory accounts. The embeddable widget is free in three sizes (Ookla charges $300+/month for Speedtest Custom), upload/ping/jitter are shown by default (unlike Fast.com, which hides them), and the entire methodology is open and verifiable. Ideal for users, webmasters, and ISPs who value privacy, fairness, and full metrics.

What's the story behind your product?

Speed-Check's answer:

Speed-Check was launched in August 2025 as an independent alternative to the ad-heavy, account-gated speed tests that dominate the market. The goal was simple: build a speed test that respects user privacy, uses open measurement protocols (M-Lab NDT7), and gives back to the web by offering a free embeddable widget and browser extensions — without ever asking for a signup.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Speed-Check's answer:

React 18, Vite 5, TypeScript 5, Tailwind CSS, M-Lab NDT7 (measurement protocol), Cloudflare (CDN and edge measurement endpoints), Supabase (backend/edge functions), and PWA standards. Browser extensions are built on Manifest V3 (Chrome) and the WebExtensions API (Firefox 140+).

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

Speed-Check's answer:

As a privacy first speed test this is unknown to us. None of our users are being tracked by size and they don't need to sign up on our website.

User comments

Share your experience with using Commit Together by Github and Speed-Check. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Commit Together by Github 1 mention
Speed-Check 0 mentions
  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

Tracking Speed-Check since May 2026.

Alternatives to Commit Together by Github and Speed-Check

When comparing Commit Together by Github and Speed-Check, you can also consider the following products.