
Refined GitHub
GitHub for Mobile
GitHub for Atom
Board for Github
GitStreak
CommitTasks
Co-commit
Now add co-authors to your commits

Scult Tools
PerformanceTest
iLoveSchema
Free MultiLipi Schema.org Generator
Speedtest.net
SEOReviewTools FAQ Schema Generator
Fast.com
Speed-Check is a free, privacy-first browser speed test measuring download, upload, ping, and jitter via M-Lab NDT7 — no signup, no tracking, no app required.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Commit Together by Github seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.blog | speed-check.net |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from Germany · 1 - 9 employees · 2025 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Commit Together by Github yet.
Speed-Check is a free, open, and privacy-first internet speed test that measures your download speed, upload speed, ping, and jitter directly in your browser — no signup, no app install, and no tracking of personal data. Unlike most mainstream speed tests, Speed-Check runs on the M-Lab NDT7...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Commit Together by Github yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Commit Together by Github and Speed-Check.
Speed-Check's answer:
Privacy-conscious internet users, remote workers, gamers, and streamers who want a fast, accurate, no-nonsense speed test — plus webmasters, bloggers, and ISPs looking for a free, embeddable widget. Secondary audiences include journalists and researchers who use the global country rankings and the open M-Lab methodology for citations.
Speed-Check's answer:
Speed-Check is an open-source, privacy-first internet speed test built on the M-Lab NDT7 protocol (the same standard Google uses) combined with Cloudflare endpoints. Unlike most competitors, it requires no account, stores no personal data on public pages, runs only a single light ad placement, and offers a completely free embeddable widget — features that are paywalled or hidden elsewhere. It also ships with dedicated Chrome and Firefox extensions, a PWA install option, and detailed country-level rankings, glossaries, and guides.
Speed-Check's answer:
Because it combines accuracy with transparency: M-Lab NDT7 results within 2–5% of Ookla, but without the heavy ads, tracking, video pre-rolls, or mandatory accounts. The embeddable widget is free in three sizes (Ookla charges $300+/month for Speedtest Custom), upload/ping/jitter are shown by default (unlike Fast.com, which hides them), and the entire methodology is open and verifiable. Ideal for users, webmasters, and ISPs who value privacy, fairness, and full metrics.
Speed-Check's answer:
Speed-Check was launched in August 2025 as an independent alternative to the ad-heavy, account-gated speed tests that dominate the market. The goal was simple: build a speed test that respects user privacy, uses open measurement protocols (M-Lab NDT7), and gives back to the web by offering a free embeddable widget and browser extensions — without ever asking for a signup.
Speed-Check's answer:
React 18, Vite 5, TypeScript 5, Tailwind CSS, M-Lab NDT7 (measurement protocol), Cloudflare (CDN and edge measurement endpoints), Supabase (backend/edge functions), and PWA standards. Browser extensions are built on Manifest V3 (Chrome) and the WebExtensions API (Firefox 140+).
Speed-Check's answer:
As a privacy first speed test this is unknown to us. None of our users are being tracked by size and they don't need to sign up on our website.
Share your experience with using Commit Together by Github and Speed-Check. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
Tracking Speed-Check since May 2026.
When comparing Commit Together by Github and Speed-Check, you can also consider the following products.

Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful
Compare Refined GitHub to Commit Together by Github or Speed-Check:

Free tools, prompts and skills for humans and AI agents
Compare Scult Tools to Commit Together by Github or Speed-Check:

The world’s development platform, in your pocket
Compare GitHub for Mobile to Commit Together by Github or Speed-Check:

Run a free website speed test from around the globe using real browsers at consumer connection speeds with detailed optimization recommendations.Simple Testing · Visual Comparison · Traceroute · I optimized my first site.
Compare PerformanceTest to Commit Together by Github or Speed-Check:
Git and GitHub integration right inside Atom
Compare GitHub for Atom to Commit Together by Github or Speed-Check:

Instantly generate and validate JSON-LD Schema Markup for FAQs, Products, Articles, Local Business, Reviews, and more. 100% free, fully Google-compliant, and easy to use
Compare iLoveSchema to Commit Together by Github or Speed-Check: