Commit Together by Github VS Sourcegraph for GitHub

• Enhanced Collaboration
  Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
• Improved Code Review Process
  With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
• Accountability
  By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
• Efficiency in Pair Programming
  When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Commit History
  Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
• Potential Workflow Conflicts
  Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
• Initial Setup Overhead
  Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
• Tooling Compatibility
  Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

• Enhanced Code Search
  Sourcegraph offers powerful code search capabilities, allowing users to search across multiple repositories and find specific code snippets quickly.
• Seamless Integration
  It integrates seamlessly with GitHub, providing a more cohesive experience for developers who rely on GitHub for version control.
• Cross-repository Navigation
  Sourcegraph enables users to navigate across repositories, which is particularly useful for projects that span multiple codebases.
• Code Intelligence
  Provides code intelligence features such as hover tooltips and go-to-definition, improving the understanding of large and complex codebases.
• Collaboration Features
  Sourcegraph enhances collaboration by allowing teams to share links to code, improving communication and code review processes.

Possible disadvantages

• Performance Issues
  Some users may experience performance lags, especially when dealing with large repositories or complex codebases.
• Learning Curve
  New users may face a learning curve to utilize all the features effectively, which may deter those looking for a quick setup.
• Limited Offline Access
  Sourcegraph primarily functions online, making it less useful for developers working in environments with limited internet connectivity.
• Dependency on Browsers
  Being a browser-based extension, it may lack some of the features available in standalone code editors or IDEs.
• Privacy Concerns
  Some users might be concerned about privacy and security, as Sourcegraph handles code browsing data, which may include sensitive information.

• Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?

  There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

• 6 Chrome & VS Code Extensions For Backend Developers

  Sourcegraph: Adds code intelligence to GitHub, GitLab, and other hosts: hovers, definitions, references. For 20+ languages. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago