Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Commit Together by Github VS RAWGraphs

Compare Commit Together by Github VS RAWGraphs and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

RAWGraphs logo RAWGraphs

RAWGraphs is an open source app built with the goal of making the visualization of complex data...
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04
  • RAWGraphs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-16

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

RAWGraphs features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    RAWGraphs provides an intuitive drag and drop interface, making it accessible for users with various technical skills.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, RAWGraphs allows for customization and community contributions, promoting transparency and flexibility.
  • Supports Multiple Data Formats
    RAWGraphs supports a variety of input formats like CSV, TSV, JSON, etc., enhancing its adaptability to different data sources.
  • Extensive Visualization Types
    Offers a wide range of visualization types such as bar graphs, scatter plots, and network graphs, catering to diverse analytical needs.
  • No Installation Required
    As a web-based tool, it does not require any installation, making it easy to access and use anywhere with an internet connection.
  • Export Options
    Allows exporting visualizations in vector (SVG) and raster (PNG) formats, which is valuable for high-quality reporting and presentations.

Possible disadvantages of RAWGraphs

  • Limited Interactivity
    Visualizations created with RAWGraphs are generally static, lacking advanced interactive features found in other tools.
  • Performance with Large Datasets
    May struggle with performance issues when handling very large datasets, which can limit its use for extensive data analytics.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic functionalities are user-friendly, leveraging advanced features and customizations may require a steeper learning curve.
  • Dependency on Internet
    As a web-based application, it requires an internet connection to function, which can be a limitation in restricted or offline environments.
  • Limited Data Manipulation
    Provides basic data manipulation features, but lacks the depth and complexity available in specialized data processing tools.
  • Support and Documentation
    As an open-source project, it may not have the extensive support and documentation available with commercial visualization tools.

Analysis of RAWGraphs

Overall verdict

  • Yes, RAWGraphs is a good tool for creating data visualizations due to its ease of use, versatility, and robust support for different data types and outputs.

Why this product is good

  • RAWGraphs is considered a good data visualization tool because it is open-source, versatile, and easy to use. It allows users to create a wide variety of charts and visualizations without needing extensive coding knowledge. Its interface is intuitive and facilitates the quick transformation of data sets into visually compelling graphics. Furthermore, it supports multiple formats for data input and export, making it flexible for various project needs.

Recommended for

  • data analysts
  • journalists
  • researchers
  • educators
  • students
  • designers who need to create visualizations without in-depth coding skills.

Commit Together by Github videos

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

RAWGraphs videos

RawGraphs Walkthrough

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Commit Together by Github and RAWGraphs)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Data Visualization
0 0%
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Charting Libraries
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Commit Together by Github and RAWGraphs. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Commit Together by Github and RAWGraphs

Commit Together by Github Reviews

We have no reviews of Commit Together by Github yet.
Be the first one to post

RAWGraphs Reviews

Top 10 Tableau Open Source Alternatives: A Comprehensive List
RAWGraphs is an open-source Data Visualization tool designed to make visualizing complex data simple for everyone. The primary goal of RAWGraphs is to provide a tool that allows people who do not have the technical/coding expertise to create visualizations on their own. Originally designed to help graphic designers complete a set of tasks that were not available in other...
Source: hevodata.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, RAWGraphs should be more popular than Commit Together by Github. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

RAWGraphs mentions (5)

  • Interview synthesis tools?
    Go back through a second time Code themes / pull insights/ double check for keywords tag accuracy Use Dovetailโ€™s โ€œchartsโ€ to review various tags (it will show you how many tags per word in various chart options, none are great.) Export desired csvโ€™s from Dovetail Charts to free online data viz software like https://rawgraphs.io Boom. Iโ€™m sure there are better ways but thatโ€™s what I got! Source: over 4 years ago
  • What type/style of chart is this?
    Sankey is probably the most common name (after Captain Matthew Henry Phineas Riall Sankey who apparently made them to study energy flows in steam engines). But I've also heard it referred to as an alluvial diagram, for example in https://rawgraphs.io/. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Show HN: I made a data visualization desktop app
    This seems quite similar to RawGraphs: https://rawgraphs.io/ Both seem to provide a similar interface for dragging in a CSV file and constructing a chart, but RawGraphs is open-source, and can be used in the browser without installing anything (or the code can be downloaded and served locally). The main advantage of Daigo over RawGraphs seems to be that it supports publishing multiple charts as a dashboard.... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
  • [OC] Latin Americaโ€™s biggest airports had been growing steadily. With Covid, it all changed.
    Tools: Excel, Rawgraphs, Affinity Designer. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Self-hosted solution for easy data visualization?
    Take a look at https://rawgraphs.io/. Source: about 5 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Commit Together by Github and RAWGraphs, you can also consider the following products

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

Plotly - Low-Code Data Apps

GitHub for Mobile - The worldโ€™s development platform, in your pocket

D3.js - D3.js is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. D3 helps you bring data to life using HTML, SVG, and CSS.

GitHub for Atom - Git and GitHub integration right inside Atom

Tableau - Tableau can help anyone see and understand their data. Connect to almost any database, drag and drop to create visualizations, and share with a click.