Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Commit Together by Github VS GitClear

Compare Commit Together by Github VS GitClear and see what are their differences

Startup Fame
Discover awesome startups. Add yours in seconds and climb the SEO ranks. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

GitClear logo GitClear

Data-driven insight for developer impact and code review
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04
  • GitClear Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-22

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

GitClear features and specs

  • Detailed Code Metrics
    GitClear offers in-depth metrics to track the productivity and contributions of individual developers and teams. This includes line impact, which measures changes in a more nuanced way.
  • Integrations
    The platform integrates seamlessly with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, providing a cohesive workflow.
  • Visualization Tools
    GitClear provides powerful visualization tools that help identify code churn, technical debt, and other critical areas that need attention.
  • Commit Analysis
    It offers commit-by-commit analysis to better understand the context and impact of individual contributions.
  • Customizable Reports
    Users can customize reports to focus on the metrics that matter most to their teams, making it more adaptable to different project needs.

Possible disadvantages of GitClear

  • Complexity
    The tool can be complex to set up and use, particularly for those unfamiliar with advanced code metrics and reporting.
  • Cost
    GitClear is a paid service, which might be a hurdle for smaller teams or individual developers who have lower budgets.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Some developers may have concerns about privacy and how their individual contributions are tracked and analyzed.
  • Overemphasis on Metrics
    The reliance on quantitative metrics might overshadow qualitative aspects of coding, potentially leading to misinterpretation of a developer's effectiveness.
  • Learning Curve
    Given its rich feature set, there can be a significant learning curve for new users to fully utilize the platform's capabilities.

Analysis of GitClear

Overall verdict

  • GitClear is generally well-regarded for its ability to translate complex development activities into actionable insights, particularly for larger teams where understanding productivity at scale is challenging. Its features cater to both technical and non-technical stakeholders, making it a versatile tool for development teams.

Why this product is good

  • GitClear is considered good by many users because it provides deep insights into codebase activity and developer productivity. It offers visualizations that help teams understand the impact of code changes, track progress, and identify bottlenecks in projects. It helps managers and team leads make informed decisions and improve workflow efficiency by analyzing commit data and other code metrics.

Recommended for

    GitClear is recommended for software development teams, engineering managers, and product leads who need a detailed understanding of their team's code contributions and productivity. It is particularly useful for larger or distributed teams where collaboration and transparency are critical. It's also beneficial for companies looking to optimize their development process and better align technical efforts with business goals.

Commit Together by Github videos

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

GitClear videos

+ Add

GitClear Line Impact and Commit Groups Explainer

More videos:

  • Review - Browsing code directories with GitClear

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Commit Together by Github and GitClear)

Commit Together by Github

GitClear

Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0
Data Dashboard
0 0%
Data Dashboard
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Software Engineering
0 0%
Software Engineering
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Commit Together by Github and GitClear. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Commit Together by Github seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

GitClear mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GitClear yet. Tracking of GitClear recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Commit Together by Github and GitClear, you can also consider the following products

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

Waydev - Waydev analyzes your codebase from Github, Gitlab, Azure DevOps & Bitbucket to help you bring out the best in your engineers work.

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

GitPrime - GitPrime uses data from any Git based code repository to give management the software engineering metrics needed to move faster and optimize work patterns.

CommitTasks - A small CLI tool that combines git commit and todo list 🛠📝

LinearB - LinearB delivers software leaders the insights they need to make their engineering teams better through a real-time SaaS platform. Visibility into key metrics paired with automated improvement actions enables software leaders to deliver more.

Loading...