Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Commit Together by Github VS Finicky

Compare Commit Together by Github VS Finicky and see what are their differences

Appark.ai
Free app market analytics tool for growth and competition insights. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

Finicky logo Finicky

A MacOS app for creating rules that decide which browser is opened for every link that would open...
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04
  • Finicky Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Finicky features and specs

  • Custom URL Handling
    Finicky allows users to customize which browser opens certain URLs, providing a tailored browsing experience.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, Finicky allows users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code, enhancing transparency and community involvement.
  • Scriptable
    Users can write scripts to finely control how URLs are routed, providing a high degree of flexibility and customization.
  • Lightweight
    Finicky is designed to be a lightweight application, minimizing system resource usage compared to heavier browser manager alternatives.

Possible disadvantages of Finicky

  • Complex Configuration
    For users unfamiliar with scripting, setting up Finicky could be complex and intimidating, requiring a learning curve.
  • Limited to macOS
    Finicky is only available for macOS, meaning users on other platforms cannot take advantage of its features.
  • Community Support
    As an open-source project, the level of support and documentation may not match commercial software, possibly leading to challenges in troubleshooting.

Commit Together by Github videos

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Finicky videos

+ Add

Finicky Eater Diago TruDog Dog Food Review

More videos:

  • Review - Geek Vape Zeus Dual Review - Not as finicky as the original one...
  • Review - 7" finicky tickler in tank review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Commit Together by Github and Finicky)

Commit Together by Github

Finicky

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
Project Management
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
Website Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Commit Together by Github and Finicky. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Finicky seems to be a lot more popular than Commit Together by Github. While we know about 25 links to Finicky, we've tracked only 1 mention of Commit Together by Github. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

Finicky mentions (25)

  • BambuStudio has been violating PrusaSlicer AGPL license since their fork
    There is an open source web browser proxy thing called finicky [0]. I use at work that lets me redirect urls clicked in other apps like slack to specific browers (firefox / chrome) or even specific chrome profiles. It'll also allow you to rewrite the urls. [0] https://github.com/johnste/finicky. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • McLovin: the cross-platform link router
    On Mac I used Finicky. I switched to Linux with Omarchy almost a year ago and went looking for an equivalent. Junction only asks every time, mimi doesn't carry routing rules. The remaining path was "build your own", and I did. It worked well, with a TUI that paired nicely with Omarchy. Then I thought: this should be a built-in feature on every OS, the same way each OS has a rule for which app opens PDFs. So I... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Link routing: the feature OSes and browsers pretend isn't there
    On Mac I used Finicky for this. For anyone who never saw it: it lets you write rules that decide which browser opens each link. You set Finicky as the system's default browser, and it applies your rules to every link clicked in any app, picking the right one. Rules are short scripts in JavaScript, simple or as elaborate as you need. It can even rewrite the URL before opening it: force HTTPS, strip tracking... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Want to piss off your IT department? Are the links not malicious looking enough?
    In addition to making the link look shady, it adds considerable lag to opening the link. I'm using Finicky[1] on Mac to rewrite the URL by extracting the original URL from the query params[2]. 1: https://github.com/johnste/finicky 2: https://github.com/fphilipe/dotfiles/blob/31e3d18fe5f51b2fd86cb7f1762453c1c4779ef9/finicky.js#L4-L8. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Show HN: I built a small utility that handles multiple browser instances for you
    Just curious, did you explore finicky(https://github.com/johnste/finicky)? - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Commit Together by Github and Finicky, you can also consider the following products

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

Choosy - Choosy opens links in different browsers as specified, according to rules, set by the user.

GitHub for Mobile - The worldโ€™s development platform, in your pocket

Browser Tamer - Makes correct URLs open in browsers you want instead of the system defaults.

GitHub for Atom - Git and GitHub integration right inside Atom

Junction - Choose the application to open files and links

Loading...