Software Alternatives & Startups

Commit Together by Github VS FeedMail

Compare Commit Together by Github VS FeedMail and see what are their differences

Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

Rating
0 reviews
FeedMail

FeedMail sends you updates from your favourite websites directly to your inbox (or filed nicely into a label of your choice).

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial $10 (1000 Notifications)

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, FeedMail seems to be a lot more popular than Commit Together by Github. While we know about 24 links to FeedMail, we've tracked only 1 mention of Commit Together by Github.

social mentions
1 vs 24
Developer Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
68 vs 82

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Commit Together by Github
FeedMail
Website github.blog feedmail.org
Pricing —
Paid Free trial $10 (1000 Notifications) Official pricing
Platforms —
Web
Company — 2021
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Commit Together by Github 4 features
FeedMail 3 features
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.
  • Digests
  • Full-Text Fetching
  • Real-Time Notifications
    For Feeds that support it

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Commit Together by Github
FeedMail
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
RSS
100% 100%
57% 57%
43% 43%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Commit Together by Github and FeedMail.

What makes your product unique?

FeedMail's answer:

FeedMail is a no-nonsense, low-cost RSS-to-Email service. Buy credits and get notifications. Notification emails support rich formatting from the feed itself without adding much borders and formatting that cramps the content.

What's the story behind your product?

FeedMail's answer:

Kevin had been using other RSS-to-Email services for 8 years and despite paying for the premium plan wasn't fully satisfied with the offerings. He decided to make his own and make it available to others.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

FeedMail's answer:

FeedMail believes in simple and reliable code. It is written as a Rust service powered by a PostgreSQL database.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

FeedMail's answer:

FeedMail is primarily used by individuals.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

FeedMail's answer:

Someone who wants to stay up to date online. - Personal Entertainment: Follow news, blogs, comics or video channels. - Market Research: Follow blogs and press releases of others in your field. - Stay Updated: Follow software updates and vulnerability announcements.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

FeedMail's answer:

  • Easy to manage via email filters, keep your updates agonized and out of your inbox.
  • No ads or up-sells.
  • Simple minimal notification templates that keeps the focus on what you follow.
  • Pay-as-you-go pricing scales with you. Almost always cheaper than other providers and no limits for heavy users.

User comments

Share your experience with using Commit Together by Github and FeedMail. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Commit Together by Github 1 mention
FeedMail 24 mentions
  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Commit Together by Github and FeedMail

When comparing Commit Together by Github and FeedMail, you can also consider the following products.