Commit Together by Github VS Deviceplane

• Enhanced Collaboration
  Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
• Improved Code Review Process
  With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
• Accountability
  By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
• Efficiency in Pair Programming
  When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Commit History
  Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
• Potential Workflow Conflicts
  Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
• Initial Setup Overhead
  Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
• Tooling Compatibility
  Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

• Open Source
  Deviceplane is an open-source platform, which means that you can access its source code, customize it according to your needs, and contribute to its development.
• Easy Device Management
  The platform provides a straightforward way to manage and monitor IoT devices, making it simpler to oversee large fleets of hardware.
• Secure Deployment
  Deviceplane emphasizes secure deployments, offering built-in mechanisms to ensure that devices and data are protected from unauthorized access.
• Scalability
  The platform is designed to scale efficiently, allowing you to manage a growing number of devices without significant overhead.
• Web-based Interface
  It provides a user-friendly web interface allowing users to manage devices, monitor performance, and deploy updates easily.

Possible disadvantages

• Complexity for Beginners
  For users who are new to device management platforms, there might be a steep learning curve involved with understanding and utilizing all of Deviceplane's features effectively.
• Limited Integrations
  Deviceplane may have fewer integrations with third-party services compared to some competitors, which might limit its functionality in environments that rely on a variety of digital tools.
• Resource Intensive
  Running Deviceplane can be resource-intensive, potentially requiring more computational power and memory, which could be a drawback for smaller operations with limited resources.
• Dependence on Community Support
  As an open-source project, users may have to rely on community support for troubleshooting and new feature requests, which can lead to delays if issues arise.
• Feature Maturity
  Some features of Deviceplane may not be as mature or robust as those offered by other, more established device management platforms.

• Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?

  There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

• SSH into your private machines from anywhere, for free, using Cloudflare Tunnel

  I'm using Deviceplane for this right now - it's designed for embedded linux machines but could be used on any linux distro. Is anyone else using Deviceplane still? It seems the project has gone dead, though the website and github pages... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago