Commit Together by Github VS Days.To

• Enhanced Collaboration
  Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
• Improved Code Review Process
  With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
• Accountability
  By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
• Efficiency in Pair Programming
  When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Commit History
  Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
• Potential Workflow Conflicts
  Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
• Initial Setup Overhead
  Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
• Tooling Compatibility
  Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

• User-Friendly Interface
  Days.To offers a simple and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to input dates and quickly understand the countdown or difference in days.
• Quick Calculations
  The website provides fast calculations of the number of days between dates, which is helpful for planning events or setting deadlines.
• Free to Use
  Days.To is free to access, allowing users to calculate date differences without any subscription or payment.
• No Registration Required
  Users can use the service without the need to register or provide personal information, ensuring privacy and convenience.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Features
  The website primarily focuses on counting days between dates, which might not meet the needs of users looking for more comprehensive calendar functionalities.
• Ad Interruptions
  Users may experience interruptions due to advertisements on the site, which can detract from the user experience.
• Dependence on Internet Access
  Days.To requires an internet connection to function, which might be inconvenient for users who need offline access.
• Lack of Customization
  There are few options for users to customize the look or outputs of the site to better fit personal preferences or specific needs.

• Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?

  There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

Tracking Days.To since Mar 2021.