Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Commit Together by Github VS Commits.io

Compare Commit Together by Github VS Commits.io and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

Commits.io logo Commits.io

Create a poster for your office using your code
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04
  • Commits.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-27

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Commits.io features and specs

  • Customization
    Commits.io allows users to create personalized posters of their GitHub contributions, enabling customization of specific milestones or events.
  • Aesthetic Appeal
    The service provides an aesthetically pleasing way to showcase one's GitHub activity, transforming digital contributions into tangible artwork.
  • Motivation
    Having a physical representation of one's work can serve as a motivational tool and provide a sense of accomplishment.
  • Gifting
    The option to generate customized posters makes it an ideal gift for developers who appreciate personalized and meaningful presents.

Possible disadvantages of Commits.io

  • Cost
    There is a cost associated with printing and shipping the posters, which might be a deterrent for some users.
  • Limited Audience
    The service primarily appeals to developers actively using GitHub, limiting its broader applicability and audience.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Users need to consider the privacy of their GitHub data, as sharing contribution information might not be desirable for everyone.
  • Dependence on GitHub
    The service relies heavily on GitHub data, which means that changes to GitHub's API or data access permissions could impact functionality.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Commit Together by Github and Commits.io)

Commit Together by Github

Commits.io

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Productivity
57 57%
Productivity
43% 43
Web App
0 0%
Web App
100% 100
User Experience
41 41%
User Experience
59% 59

User comments

Share your experience with using Commit Together by Github and Commits.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Commit Together by Github seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

Commits.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Commits.io yet. Tracking of Commits.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Commit Together by Github and Commits.io, you can also consider the following products

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

Text Mess - Turn your text messages into art

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

RePix - RePix helps you in batch resizing any image into a preset resolution and save it easily and quickly.

GitHub for Atom - Git and GitHub integration right inside Atom

Co-commit - Co-author commits on GitHub when pair programming.

Loading...