
Refined GitHub
GitHub for Mobile
GitHub for Atom
Board for Github
GitStreak
Commit Print
Commit Club
Now add co-authors to your commits

LaunchDirectories
SubmitSaaS
AI Directories
StartupSubmit.app
ListingBott
SubmitWell
Backlink List For StartUps
SaaS Listings Management Platform that Actually Does the Work

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Commit Together by Github seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.blog | blastra.io |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2025 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Commit Together by Github yet.
Blastra is a digital foorpring management platform for B2B software companies. It manages product narrative across high-quality directories and review platforms like G2, Capterra, SourceForge, TrustRadius, and others. Blastra assesses, creates, and maintains accurate directory narratives. It...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Commit Together by Github yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Blastra Review-Did This REALLY Serve The Expected Purpose Or ??See(Check Before use
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Commit Together by Github and Blastra.
Blastra's answer:
Modern web stack with AI/LLM integration for content generation, cloud infrastructure for scalability, and automated workflow systems for managing submissions across multiple platforms.
Blastra's answer:
Blastra serves B2B software companies that need to manage product narrative across third-party platforms. Common users include small teams shipping frequent product updates who struggle to keep the world informed, large companies with multiple existing listings but no system for keeping them centralized and current, companies coming out of stealth establishing third-party presence for the first time, post-funding companies building credibility with enterprise buyers through reviews and badges, and companies going through a rebrand or pivot needing consistent updates across every platform.
Blastra's answer:
Blastra provides a centralized dashboard where you see every listing, its status, credentials, and profile links in one place. It handles submissions compliantly, following each directory's specific policies and requirements. After the work is done, you retain full access to all accounts. The platform also supports multi-product companies with separate profiles mapped to different directory taxonomies, something most alternatives don't address.
Blastra's answer:
Blastra focuses on ongoing listings management rather than one-time submissions. It combines AI automation with human operators to handle the full lifecycle—discovery, creation, optimization, and maintenance—across 25+ high-quality directories. Listings are individually crafted, reviewed by humans, and kept current over time with decay detection and regular updates.
Blastra's answer:
Blastra was built to solve a problem most B2B software companies recognize but nobody internally wants to own: managing presence across dozens of directories with different portals, requirements, and review cycles. Listings go stale, new directories get ignored, reviews go unanswered, and earned badges go unnoticed. As buying moves to AI, LLMs increasingly use these catalogs for training and live search, making accurate, verified listings even more critical. Blastra operates as the equivalent of a dedicated team member responsible for third-party presence at a fraction of the cost of a part-time hire.
Blastra's answer:
Blastra's largest customers are companies with 200+ people with multiple products in their portfolio.
Share your experience with using Commit Together by Github and Blastra. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
Tracking Blastra since Nov 2025.
When comparing Commit Together by Github and Blastra, you can also consider the following products.

Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful
Compare Refined GitHub to Commit Together by Github or Blastra:

Discover 100+ curated startup directories, launch platforms, and high-authority sites to boost visibility and earn quality backlinks.
Compare LaunchDirectories to Commit Together by Github or Blastra:

The world’s development platform, in your pocket
Compare GitHub for Mobile to Commit Together by Github or Blastra:

Submit to 100+ directories and boost your SaaS today
Compare SubmitSaaS to Commit Together by Github or Blastra:
Git and GitHub integration right inside Atom
Compare GitHub for Atom to Commit Together by Github or Blastra:

We can help you launch your AI product to 100+ directories.
Compare AI Directories to Commit Together by Github or Blastra: