Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Commit Print VS Gitea

Compare Commit Print VS Gitea and see what are their differences

Flowlu
All-in-one work management platform for team collaboration. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Commit Print logo Commit Print

Posters of your git history

Gitea logo Gitea

A painless self-hosted Git service
  • Commit Print Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-05
  • Gitea Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-20

Commit Print features and specs

  • Personalization
    Commit Print offers personalized items, allowing users to customize prints which can make for unique gifts or personal memorabilia.
  • Wide Range of Products
    The platform provides a variety of products, ensuring users have many options to choose from for their specific needs or preferences.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The website's user-friendly design makes it simple for customers to navigate and complete their orders without any difficulty.
  • Print Quality
    High-quality print materials and technologies ensure that the finished products meet customer expectations in terms of appearance and durability.
  • Gift Option
    Commit Print offers options to create personalized gifts, making it a convenient choice for special occasions and celebrations.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Print

  • Pricing
    Some users may find the pricing to be higher compared to generic, non-customized printing services.
  • Delivery Times
    Depending on the level of customization and location, delivery times might be longer than standard printing services.
  • Limited Edition Options
    While offering a wide range of products, there might be limitations on seasonal or specialty items availability, which can affect choices.
  • Customer Service
    Some users might experience delays or difficulties in customer service responses or issue resolutions.
  • Return Policy Restrictions
    Customized items often come with stricter return policies, which can be a drawback if the customer is not satisfied with the product.

Gitea features and specs

  • Open Source
    Gitea is open source, allowing users to freely inspect, modify, and contribute to its codebase. This fosters transparency and community-driven development.
  • Lightweight
    Gitea is designed to be lightweight, making it easy to run even on resource-limited systems. This makes it ideal for self-hosted environments.
  • Easy Installation
    Gitea offers a straightforward installation process, making it simple for users to get up and running quickly without complex setup procedures.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Despite being lightweight, Gitea provides a robust feature set, including issue tracking, pull requests, and continuous integration support, which covers the majority of use cases.
  • Active Community
    Gitea has an active and growing community, which contributes to its development and provides support through forums, documentation, and tutorials.
  • Customizable
    Gitea allows for extensive customization through configuration options and extensions, enabling users to tailor the platform to their specific needs.
  • Self-Hosting
    Users have full control over their repositories and data when self-hosting Gitea, which enhances privacy and security compared to third-party hosting services.

Possible disadvantages of Gitea

  • Limited Enterprise Features
    Gitea may lack some advanced enterprise features found in other platforms like GitHub Enterprise or GitLab, such as advanced permissions management and extensive integrations.
  • Smaller Ecosystem
    Compared to larger platforms like GitHub, Gitea has a smaller ecosystem of plugins and integrations, which may limit certain functionalities.
  • Community Support
    While Gitea has an active community, it lacks the formal, professional support options available from larger commercial services, which might be a drawback for businesses seeking guaranteed support.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may experience a learning curve when transitioning to Gitea, especially if they are accustomed to other platforms with different workflows and interfaces.
  • Scalability Concerns
    For very large projects or organizations, Gitea may face scalability issues, as it is designed to be lightweight and may not handle extremely large loads as well as some competitors.
  • Update Management
    Users are responsible for managing Gitea updates and server maintenance when self-hosting, which requires additional administrative effort compared to cloud-hosted solutions.

Commit Print videos

No Commit Print videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Gitea videos

+ Add

GITEA REVIEW ⭐ TUTORIAL 👨 RUN YOUR OWN GIT SERVER 💻 $50 FREEBIE 💰

More videos:

  • Review - Migrate to a Microsoft Github Alternative: Gitea
  • Review - Gitea - Git with a cup of tea - Installation and Configuration

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Commit Print and Gitea)

Commit Print

Gitea

Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
Code Collaboration
100% 100
User Experience
100 100%
User Experience
0% 0
Git
0 0%
Git
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Commit Print and Gitea. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Commit Print and Gitea

Commit Print Reviews

We have no reviews of Commit Print yet.
Be the first one to post

Gitea Reviews

The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives
Gitea is a painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service that includes Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry, and CI/CD. It is similar to GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab. Gitea was forked from Gogs originally and almost all the code has been changed.
Source: www.wearedevelopers.com
Top 7 GitHub Alternatives You Should Know (2024)
Gitea is a lightweight, fast, and reliable DevOps platform providing development teams with essential version control and collaboration features. k
Source: snappify.com
Let's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Option
The Pull Request workflow is so dominant now that it’s considered the default path for code to permanently enter into a repository. You can see a similar features in GitHub’s smaller competition Codeberg, GitLab, BitBucket, and Gitea. These competitors don’t offer other, major code collaboration tools, and their Pull Request-like features aren’t just there to help users come...
Source: blog.edwardloveall.com
Gitea - Alternative to GitLab and GitHub
There are still plenty of things you might want centralized on a server somewhere, but it seems like a lot of the value add of GitHub, GitLab, and now Gitea is in making git repos easier to manage and interact with.
Source: news.ycombinator.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Gitea seems to be a lot more popular than Commit Print. While we know about 60 links to Gitea, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Commit Print. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Commit Print mentions (3)

Gitea mentions (60)

  • Beware Offers of “Help” with Your Projects
    This reminds me of Gogs [0], where the original author refused a lot of good ideas and improvements, eventually leading to a fork [1] that's now a lot more popular and active than the original. [0] https://gogs.io/ [1] https://gitea.io/en-us/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Incident with Issues and Pull Requests
    Yes, we do this using https://gitea.io/en-us/ on a private server. Firewall, backups and a replica running for most projects. Github is only used when it's required by a stakeholder. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Let's Make Sure GitHub Doesn't Become the Only Option
    There's a number of places out there, some of which also support alternatives to Git itself. By no means a complete list and in no particular order: GitLab - https://about.gitlab.com/ Sourcehut - https://sourcehut.org/ Codeberg - https://codeberg.org/ Launchpad - https://launchpad.net/ Debian Salsa - https://salsa.debian.org/public Pagure - https://pagure.io/pagure For self hsoted options, there's these below... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • If you're on DSM 6 and still waiting for an update on the GitLab package, don't bother
    And if you need GitLab (for runner, etc...) then it's not too bad to run in Docker. But if anyone is looking for a somewhat simpler git solution, gitea is pretty great. Source: about 2 years ago
  • OpenBSD Upgrade 7.2 to 7.3
    Check: Configuration and syntax changes and Special packages. The latter includes changes on PostgreSQL, Python and Gitea. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Commit Print and Gitea, you can also consider the following products

Commits.io - Create a poster for your office using your code

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Commit Together by Github - Now add co-authors to your commits

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

CommitTasks - A small CLI tool that combines git commit and todo list 🛠📝

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

Loading...