Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CodeTasty VS RunsOn

Compare CodeTasty VS RunsOn and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CodeTasty logo CodeTasty

CodeTasty is a programming platform for developers in the cloud.

RunsOn logo RunsOn

Access the fastest and cheapest self-hosted runners on the market with a one-line change. Easily installable in your own AWS account. x64 and arm64 architectures supported.
  • CodeTasty Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-01
  • RunsOn 10x cheaper GitHub Action runners
    10x cheaper GitHub Action runners //
    2024-01-23
  • RunsOn Cheaper AND faster than BuildJet / Warpbuild / GitHub
    Cheaper AND faster than BuildJet / Warpbuild / GitHub //
    2024-01-23

Cheap runners are just one part of the equation: nobody likes slow runs, even if it's cheap.

RunsOn gives you access to some of the fastest machines on the market, thanks to AWS extensive hardware selection.

Which makes RunsOn the fastest provider of self-hosted, fully ephemeral runners on the market.

We automatically build and publish copies of the official runner images at most 24h after their official release, so that you can be certain that your workflows will always work on either GitHub runners, or your own RunsOn runners.

RunsOn

$ Details
freemium โ‚ฌ300.0 / Annually
Platforms
AWS GitHub
Release Date
2024 January

CodeTasty features and specs

  • Cloud-Based
    CodeTasty is cloud-based, allowing you to access your projects from anywhere with an internet connection, which promotes flexibility and remote collaboration.
  • Collaborative Features
    CodeTasty offers real-time collaboration features enabling multiple users to work on the same project simultaneously, which is beneficial for team projects.
  • Wide Language Support
    The platform supports multiple programming languages, making it versatile for developers working with diverse coding needs.
  • Easy Setup
    There's no need to install software locally, which simplifies the setup process and saves time for developers.
  • In-Browser Coding
    Allows users to code directly in the browser without the need for local machine resources, enhancing accessibility and convenience.

Possible disadvantages of CodeTasty

  • Limited Offline Access
    As a cloud-based IDE, it requires an internet connection to function, which can be a limitation in environments with unreliable connectivity.
  • Performance Constraints
    Depending on internet speed and browser capability, the performance may not be as high as traditional locally installed IDEs, potentially affecting efficiency.
  • Subscription Costs
    While offering a free tier, advanced features may be behind a paywall, which can be a barrier for some users or small teams with limited budgets.
  • Security Concerns
    Storing and editing code in the cloud increases the risk of potential data breaches, making security a critical consideration.
  • Dependency on Browser
    Functionality and experience might vary depending on the browser used, leading to inconsistent user experiences.

RunsOn features and specs

  • Ephemeral self-hosted runners
  • Autoscaling
  • Pricing
    10x cheaper than competition

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeTasty and RunsOn)
Text Editors
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0
GitHub
0 0%
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing CodeTasty and RunsOn.

What makes your product unique?

RunsOn's answer:

10x cheaper than GitHub official runners. Runs in your own AWS account. More secure than sharing your secrets with other third-party tools like BuildJet or Warpbuild.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

RunsOn's answer:

Cheap, fast, on-premise alternative to maintaining self-hosted runners.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

RunsOn's answer:

CTO / Senior developers

What's the story behind your product?

RunsOn's answer:

Built a similar product for one of my clients, reduced CI build cost by 10 times, and improve build speed from 1h to 20min.

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeTasty and RunsOn. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, RunsOn seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeTasty mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeTasty yet. Tracking of CodeTasty recommendations started around Mar 2021.

RunsOn mentions (11)

  • Surprise Pay $1000
    If you want a 'fixed' cost option for GitHub self hosted runners on your AWS I can't recommend https://runs-on.com/ enough. - Source: Hacker News / 28 days ago
  • GitHub Actions down again today
    There are a couple and have very good reputation - though I've never used them https://www.blacksmith.sh/ They also say that they're much cheaper than github. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • GitHub Actions is the weakest link
    My team has been using https://runs-on.com/ for AWS instance runners, had a few glitches but largely been great for using AWS instances for runners. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • GitHub Actions Is Slowly Killing Your Engineering Team
    > You know how I know GitHubโ€™s runners are bad? Because thereโ€™s an entire cottage industry of companies whose sole product is โ€œGitHub Actions, but the runners donโ€™t suck.โ€ Namespace, Blacksmith, Actuated, Runs-on, BuildJet He's not wrong. Buildjet just announced they were shutting down though, citing recent improvements to the GitHub Actions platform. For the record I maintain the Runs-on [1] he's talking about,... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions
    I am developing a self-hosted solution for this [1]. Itโ€™s true that itโ€™s somewhat of a pain but JIT runners allow a lot of flexibility that we donโ€™t find elsewhere. [1] https://runs-on.com. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeTasty and RunsOn, you can also consider the following products

GitHub Codespaces - GItHub Codespaces is a hosted remote coding environment by GitHub based on Visual Studio Codespaces integrated directly for GitHub.

Forgejo - Forgejo is a self-hosted lightweight software forge. Easy to install and low maintenance, it just does the job.

CloudShell - Cloud Shell is a free admin machine with browser-based command-line access for managing your infrastructure and applications on Google Cloud Platform.

Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket

StackHive - Design, develop or publish websites right from your browser

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.