CodeStream VS Ripcord
Compare CodeStream VS Ripcord and see what are their differences
AI agents that spec, build, test, and ship code โ with voice chat, deep GitHub integration, and zero LLM markup.
sponsored
CodeStream
Refactor.io
Figstack
PullRequest.com
GitLive
Azure DevOps
codebeat
Promyze
Ripcord
Slack
Dialog Messenger
Ziggs
Microsoft Teams
Done Hui
Mattermost
Swee.lol
CodeStream enables asynchronous communication among developers on your team, anywhere. Review changes in the context of the full source tree, using your favorite keybindings and environment. Use a simple shortcut to highlight your code and CodeStream will automatically assign a reviewer based on context and history. Comment and code review threads are automatically repositioned as your code changes, even across branches.
CodeStreamDevelopment teams who heavily rely on IDEs like Visual Studio Code, IntelliJ, and others. It is particularly useful for remote teams that require robust code review and communication tools to maintain effective collaboration.
After using this with my development team for a few weeks, we grew to love it. Product works amazing for its purpose and really helps developers communicate about our code.
Based on our record, Ripcord seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 47 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
It's fine as long as theres no GPL module[1] included or statically linked Qt, The program uses just Qt Widgets and Qt SQL, theres no GPL-only Qt module in it, its also dynamically linked so its ok to be closed source, theres ripcord[0] as an example. I just want to avoid the wave of open source rebranding that will come with AI programming being so easily accessible as theres no respect when theres easy money... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
> And the 'start a thread' nazis Social issues can't be solved by technical means. Just slightly incentivised in some direction (like discord's "this is the third reply, would you like a thread instead?") But for the resource usage, ripcord https://cancel.fm/ripcord/ already proved you can have a capable client which is super light and fast if you care. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
In practice yes. Lots of people developing and using third party clients. Of course it's not ideal with bans and API updates pulling the rug from under you with no warning, but actually not that many people get banned and ripcord (thirdparty client) was working for a long time even after being abandoned. ripcord: https://cancel.fm/ripcord/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
Discord's first-level support was not willing to reinstate my account, and I had toยฒ track down their head of security on Twitter to get my account reinstated. ยน) https://cancel.fm/ripcord/, no further development since. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
That argument would hold more power if there wasn't an existing native client for Slack and Discord, made by one person, with all the features I needed, working with absolutely no lag and minimal resource use, working on MacOS, Linux, Windows. Unfortunately the development stopped, or I'd still use it. https://cancel.fm/ripcord/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review
Slack - A messaging app for teams who see through the Earth!
Figstack - Your intelligent coding companion
Dialog Messenger - handy and feature-rich enterprise multi-device messenger available for server or cloud โ Slack-like, but not Slack-limited
PullRequest.com - Code review as a service
Ziggs - Smoothly Share Content Between Devices!