Software Alternatives & Startups

Codeship VS Arc.dev

Compare Codeship VS Arc.dev and see what are their differences

Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.

Codeship Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Arc.dev

Arc is the remote career platform helping developers build amazing careers from anywhere. Find thousands of top remote developer jobs online all in one place!

Arc.dev Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Arc.dev seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 23 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 23
Continuous Integration popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Codeship
Arc.dev
Website cloudbees.com arc.dev
Pricing
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Codeship 6 features
Arc.dev 6 features
  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.
  • Quality Talent
    Arc.dev screens and vets developers, ensuring high-quality talent is available for hire.
  • Remote Focused
    The platform is designed specifically for remote work, which is increasingly relevant in today's job market.
  • Flexible Hiring
    Arc.dev offers flexible hiring options, including full-time, part-time, and contract roles.
  • Global Reach
    Employers have access to a global pool of developers, providing a broader range of skills and expertise.
  • Hiring Assistance
    Arc.dev provides dedicated hiring consultants to help match employers with the right developers.
  • Community and Resources
    Developers have access to a supportive community and resources to help them grow their careers.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Hiring through Arc.dev can be more expensive than other platforms, given the quality and vetting process involved.
  • Niche Market
    The platform primarily caters to tech and development roles, which may not be suitable for companies looking for a wider range of skill sets.
  • Vetting Process Delay
    The thorough vetting process can sometimes lead to delays in hiring, which may not suit urgent hiring needs.
  • Geographical Constraints
    While remote work is emphasized, certain employers might face challenges with time zone differences.
  • Platform Fee
    Arc.dev charges a platform fee, which might be a barrier for startups or small businesses with limited budgets.
  • Limited User Control
    Employers might find the process less flexible compared to directly hiring through other platforms, due to the involvement of hiring consultants.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Codeship 2 videos + Add
Arc.dev 3 videos + Add

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos

  • Review - The Codeship -- Continuous Deployment made simple

Remote Work For Developers | Why I Invested In Arc.Dev on Wefunder (YC Startup)

More videos

  • Review - ARC.DEV (FKA CODEMENTORX) REVIEW: ALTERNATIVES AND COMPETITORS FOR 2020
  • Review - Arc 2.0 - The Easiest Way to Find Remote Developer Jobs | Arc.dev

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Codeship
Arc.dev
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Codeship and Arc.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Codeship no reviews yet
Arc.dev no reviews yet

View more

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Codeship 0 mentions
Arc.dev 23 mentions

Tracking Codeship since Mar 2021.

View more

Alternatives to Codeship and Arc.dev

When comparing Codeship and Arc.dev, you can also consider the following products.

  • Jenkins

    Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

    Compare Jenkins to Codeship or Arc.dev:

  • Flexiple

    Flexiple is an offshore team and GCC building company. We build, staff and run your India team end to end: hiring, payroll, compliance, HR and IT. Hire contractors, run a managed team as a micro-GCC, or build your own India entity.

    Compare Flexiple to Codeship or Arc.dev:

  • CircleCI

    CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

    Compare CircleCI to Codeship or Arc.dev:

  • Toptal

    Hire the Top 3% of Freelance Talent®. Toptal is an exclusive network of the top freelance software developers, designers, finance experts, product managers, and project managers in the world.

    Compare Toptal to Codeship or Arc.dev:

  • Travis CI

    Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.

    Compare Travis CI to Codeship or Arc.dev:

  • Upwork

    Forget the old rules. You can have the best people. Right now. Right here.

    Compare Upwork to Codeship or Arc.dev: