
neon
Supabase
GitHub Actions
Postgresus
Supabackup
SupaSafe
Scheduled logical backups for Supabase and Neon Postgres to your own AWS S3, with Ed25519-signed manifests, operator-run restore drills, and an audit chain your reviewer can verify offline.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | codegres.org | walwarden.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Codegres.org yet.
Postgres backups you can prove Walwarden gives engineering teams running Postgres on Supabase and Neon a single backup control plane with storage they own and signed restore evidence an auditor can inspect. Instead of relying on nightly dumps or provider-only backups, Walwarden monitors database...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Codegres.org and Walwarden.
Walwarden's answer:
Startups who need serverless database backups from day-0 and plan on being subject to SOC2 compliance
Walwarden's answer:
Walwarden turns Postgres backup activity into provable recoverability: near-real-time backups driven by transaction monitoring and schema-change detection, stored in S3 you control, with Ed25519-signed manifests and exportable restore evidence.
It supports Supabase and Neon today, giving teams one workflow for backups, restore verification, and audit-ready evidence.
Walwarden's answer:
Choose Walwarden when native provider backups or a scheduled pg_dump are not enough. Walwarden gives you portable backup copies in storage you control, plus a signed and dated record of what was backed up, restored, and verified.
The goal is not merely to show that a backup ran—it is to make recoverability independently inspectable during a SOC 2 or security review.
Walwarden's answer:
Walwarden's answer:
Walwarden is built for engineering, platform, infrastructure, and security leaders at B2B SaaS teams running Postgres on Supabase or Neon.
It is especially relevant to teams entering or maintaining a SOC 2 program, selling to security-conscious customers, or needing to demonstrate that a database restore actually works.
Walwarden's answer:
Trivia: The WAL in Walwarden refers to Postgres Write Ahead Log (nerdy facts)
Walwarden was built around a simple gap: a backup dashboard can show that backups exist, but it usually cannot provide a clean, durable answer to "prove that you restored this database successfully."
Walwarden turns backup and restore work into a signed evidence trail that an auditor, security reviewer, or customer can inspect later—without relying on screenshots, memory, or provider-specific recovery tooling.
Share your experience with using Codegres.org and Walwarden. For example, how are they different and which one is better?