CodeClimate VS RSpec

CodeClimate Reviews

RSpec Reviews

CodeClimate mentions (11)

• free-for.dev

  Codeclimate.com — Automated code review, free for Open Source and unlimited organisation-owned private repos (up to 4 collaborators). Also free for students and institutions. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• How To Use Code Climate To Improve Software Quality

  Want to know how to enforce allowing only high-quality software into production? Check out this post on how to use CodeClimate can help you do just that! #DevOps #SoftwareDeveloper #softwaredevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #webdevelopment #codequality. Source: almost 2 years ago

• RFC: A Full-stack Analytics Platform Architecture

  Ideally, software can quickly go from development to production. Continuous deployment and delivery are some processes that make this possible. Continuous deployment means establishing an automated pipeline from development to production while continuous delivery means maintaining the main branch in a deployable state so that a deployment can be requested at any time. Predecos uses these tools. When a commit goes... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• Adding coverage to CI pipeline?

  The new code should not drop existing code coverage I've found in practice mainly catches changes to existing code that lack proper updates to existing tests. Our company uses Code Climate for these checks, so we don't have to manage / write our own tooling for this purpose. Source: over 2 years ago

• Node.js best practices list (July 2021)

  TL;DR: Using static analysis tools helps by giving objective ways to improve code quality and keeps your code maintainable. You can add static analysis tools to your CI build to fail when it finds code smells. Its main selling points over plain linting are the ability to inspect quality in the context of multiple files (e.g. Detect duplications), perform advanced analysis (e.g. Code complexity), and follow the... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

RSpec mentions (25)

• Test Driving a Rails API - Part Two

  When starting a Rails project, you have a lot of decisions to make. Whether or not to write tests should not be one of them. The big decision is to use Minitest or Rspec. Both of those testing frameworks are great and provide everything you need to test a Rails application thoroughly. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• Should i learn testing

  As a beginner you can skip it, just focus on understanding Rails' philosophy and getting comfortable with it. However, make sure you remember to come back to unit testing later bc it's a mandatory skill for a Rails developer. Unit test can help you understand your project's specs thoroughly (assume its test coverage is more than 90%). I recommend learning RSpec instead of Rails' built-in testing tool (the one... Source: 10 months ago

• Code Reviewing a Ruby on Rails application.

  RSpec is a testing framework for Ruby that is widely used in the Ruby on Rails community. It allows developers to write and execute automated tests. RSpec promotes behavior-driven development (BDD) by providing a readable syntax for describing the expected behavior of the application. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

• Ruby RSpec

  In the Ruby programming language, one of the most popular testing frameworks is RSpec. RSpec is a flexible and expressive testing tool that allows you to write and run automated tests for your Ruby code. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Role tests for interfaces discovered through TDD

  There’s one very readable way to do it in Ruby using RSpec. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago