
Codacy
SonarQube
CodeClimate
Coverity Scan
Refactor.io
DeepSource
Checkmarx
Automated code review for Swift

CodeClimate
Codacy
SensioLabs Insight
ESLint
SonarQube
Source-Navigator NG
CodeFactor.io
Coveralls is a code coverage history and tracking tool that tests coverage reports and statistics for engineering teams.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Coveralls should be more popular than codebeat. It has been mentioned 14 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | codebeat.co | coveralls.io |
| Pricing | ||
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of codebeat yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Coveralls is recommended for software development teams and individual developers who are focused on improving code quality through comprehensive test coverage. It is especially useful for projects that already utilize CI/CD workflows, as it integrates smoothly into these processes. Teams seeking to maintain high standards of test-driven development will particularly benefit from its features.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using codebeat and Coveralls. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


CodeBeat — Automated Code Review Platform available for many languages. Free forever for public repositories with Slack & E-mail integration. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
CodeBeat is a popular code review tool that provides automated code review and feedback. It displays a code grade on a ‘4.0 scale’ system where the code gets reviewed on a scale of 1 to 4. CodeBeat supports various languages like Python,... - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
For open-source projects, many SaaS platforms offer free tiers for monitoring. For tracking code coverage, you can use Codecov or Coveralls. For tracking complexity, CodeClimate is a good option. These platforms integrate well with... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Cpan_coverage: This calculates the coverage of your test suite and reports the results. It also uploads the results to coveralls.io. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
I will normally use GitHub Actions to automatically run my test suite on each push, on every major version of Perl I support. One of the test runs will load Devel::Cover and use it to upload test coverage data to Codecov and Coveralls. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
When comparing codebeat and Coveralls, you can also consider the following products.

Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.
Compare Codacy to codebeat or Coveralls:

Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.
Compare CodeClimate to codebeat or Coveralls:

SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Compare SonarQube to codebeat or Coveralls:

PHP Project Quality Done Right.
Compare SensioLabs Insight to codebeat or Coveralls:

Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Compare Coverity Scan to codebeat or Coveralls:
