Code Signing VS git-sizer

• Authenticity
  Code signing ensures that the software creator or publisher is verified, helping users trust that the application is from a legitimate source.
• Integrity
  By signing code, you can ensure that the code has not been tampered with or altered after it was signed, protecting the integrity of the software.
• User Trust
  Users are more likely to trust and download software that has a valid signature, as it indicates the software is less likely to be malicious.
• Distribution Control
  Code signing helps prevent unauthorized modifications and distribution of software, maintaining control over distribution channels.
• Compliance
  Many platforms and distributors require software to be signed before it can be listed, ensuring compliance with platform requirements.

Possible disadvantages

• Cost
  Obtaining a code signing certificate often involves financial costs which can be a barrier for small developers or open-source projects.
• Complexity
  The process of obtaining and using a code signing certificate can be complex, requiring careful management and understanding of cryptography.
• Expiration
  Code signing certificates have expiration dates and need to be renewed periodically, which can lead to extra administrative overhead.
• Security Risks
  If the private key associated with a code signing certificate is compromised, it can lead to signed malicious code, undermining trust.
• Dependency on Providers
  Relying on third-party certificate authorities means being dependent on their infrastructure and policies, which might change over time.

• Comprehensive Repository Analysis
  git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
• Easy to Use
  The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
• Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
  It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
• Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
  Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
• Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
  It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

• No Automatic Remediation
  git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
• Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
  While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
• Limited to Local Analysis
  The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
• Command-Line Only Interface
  The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

Tracking Code Signing since Mar 2022.

• how to keep github repos small?

  Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago