
Scratch
Codecademy
Free Code Camp
W3Schools
SoloLearn
CodeCombat
Tutorialspoint
Code.org is a non-profit whose goal is to expose all students to computer programming.

bitdrift
Luciq
Embrace.io
BugSnag
Bugfender
Firebase Crashlytics
Sentry.io
Measure helps mobile teams monitor and fix crashes, ANRs, bugs, and performance issues. The open source alternative to Firebase Crashlytics.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Code.org seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 385 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | code.org | measure.sh |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | 2012 | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2024 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Code.org yet.
Measure is an open source mobile observability platform built for production debugging. It helps mobile teams find and fix crashes, ANRs, UI freezes, slow API chains and edge-case state bugs, the failures that crash reporters never show you. Most crash tools tell you that an app broke. Measure...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of Measure.sh yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Programming For Kids: Scratch vs Code.org
More videos
Measure.sh: open source crash and performance monitoring for mobile apps (demo)
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Code.org and Measure.sh.
Measure.sh's answer:
Porsche, Astro, Hoichoi
Measure.sh's answer:
Measure grew out of a problem its founders kept running into. Between them they had led mobile engineering at companies including Gojek, Rapido and Groww, including the years when Gojek's app scaled from around 10,000 to 35 million daily active users. At each company they ended up building similar internal tooling to answer the same question: why is the app slow, frozen or broken for a real user in production when crash reporting shows nothing wrong? After rebuilding versions of the same tool more than once, they decided to apply the DRY principle to the problem itself and turn it into a product instead of another internal project. Measure was released publicly in September 2024 and is developed in the open under the Apache 2.0 license, with the roadmap and issues visible on GitHub.
Measure.sh's answer:
Mobile engineering teams running consumer apps in production, especially at high growth companies where app quality has a direct effect on revenue and retention. Typical users are Android and iOS engineers, mobile platform and foundation teams, mobile leads and engineering managers who are accountable for crash free rates, ANRs, startup time and release health, along with the CTOs and VPs of Engineering who own those outcomes. Because Measure is open source and can be self hosted, it also fits teams with strict data residency or privacy requirements, and smaller teams looking for an open alternative to Firebase Crashlytics.
Measure.sh's answer:
Measure.sh is an open source observability platform built specifically for mobile apps, rather than a mobile SDK attached to a backend monitoring product. Its defining capability is the session timeline, which reconstructs a complete user session including interactions, navigations, network calls, logs, lifecycle events and CPU and memory signals. This allows teams to diagnose problems that never produce a crash, such as ANRs, UI freezes, slow API chains and edge case state bugs. Measure also provides Adaptive Capture, which lets teams change what data is collected remotely without shipping an app update, and an MCP server that exposes crashes, traces and sessions to coding agents. It is available as a managed cloud service or fully self hosted, and is licensed under Apache 2.0.
Measure.sh's answer:
Measure.sh's answer:
Share your experience with using Code.org and Measure.sh. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Code.org is an online marketplace that can empower students, specifically students, to get detailed knowledge regarding the principles of the computer sciences. This platform can let its users access the free coding...
Nevertheless, the platform has the stats to prove its dependability. More than 67 million people use Code.org, including over two million teachers. In addition, the platform records over 208 million projects so far.
Code.org is much easier to use than Thunkable.First of all names say everything.Second,it has more modes than just "drag-and-drop".
If you're looking for a modern and AI native tool for observability of mobile apps, then measure.sh is the right choice for the job It has a lot of innovative tools and a very nice dashboard for the same "Session...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Code.org uses an extremely outdated version of javascript, It's so hard to access data in array, im basically forced to do this. Cant wait to ditch this shit. Source: almost 3 years ago
I'm not sure if your 4.5yo is old enough to try Scratch[1] but nothing is too young these days. My elder got into Scratch around that time. These days, my younger one is into https://code.org and she make things go around, do stuffs,... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
So I am using code.org to make a platforming game, and if I am halfway off of a platform I slide off of it. Idk if this is a quirk with code.org or if I did something wrong. You can check the hitboxes by pressing debug sprites in the... Source: almost 3 years ago
Tracking Measure.sh since Sep 2026.
When comparing Code.org and Measure.sh, you can also consider the following products.

Scratch is the programming language & online community where young people create stories, games, & animations.
Compare Scratch to Code.org or Measure.sh:

Mobile observability & crash reporting, built for apps
Compare bitdrift to Code.org or Measure.sh:

Learn the technical skills you need for the job you want. As leaders in online education and learning to code, we’ve taught over 45 million people using a tested curriculum and an interactive learning environment.
Compare Codecademy to Code.org or Measure.sh:

Luciq is the Agentic Observability Platform for Mobile. Our intelligent AI agents detect, prioritize, and resolve issues across the app lifecycle, empowering teams to ship faster, deliver frustration-free sessions, and focus on building what matters
Compare Luciq to Code.org or Measure.sh:

Learn to code by helping nonprofits.
Compare Free Code Camp to Code.org or Measure.sh:

Embrace analyzes the details of every user session empowering mobile teams to detect, replay, and prioritize what matters most.
Compare Embrace.io to Code.org or Measure.sh: