
Open NASA
Google Open Source
Open Source @IFTTT
Nike OSS
NASA Image and Video Library
OpenKube
OpenMCT by NASA
253 NASA open source software projects

Commit Together by Github
Taskbook
Commit Print
Commits.io
ASCII Roulette
Husky.go
gitbird
A small CLI tool that combines git commit and todo list π π

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Code NASA seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 7 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | code.nasa.gov | github.com |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0β100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Code NASA and CommitTasks. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Just to be clear this is one centerβs first open source release. Thereβs open source from other centers at https://github.com/nasa. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
NASA has a good set of open source projects available for public use: https://code.nasa.gov/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Yes, this is no-cost but not necessarily open source. NASA open source software can be found at: https://code.nasa.gov/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Tracking CommitTasks since Mar 2021.
When comparing Code NASA and CommitTasks, you can also consider the following products.

Now add co-authors to your commits
Compare Commit Together by Github to Code NASA or CommitTasks:
All of Googles open source projects under a single umbrella
Compare Google Open Source to Code NASA or CommitTasks:


A collection of IFTTT OSS projects.
Compare Open Source @IFTTT to Code NASA or CommitTasks:
