
Google Open Source
Nike OSS
Disney Open Source
OpenKube
Open Source Alternatives
Desole
Open Source @ Microsoft
A collection of IFTTT OSS projects.

Open NASA
Google Open Source
Nike OSS
NASA Image and Video Library
OpenKube
OpenMCT by NASA
NASA App
253 NASA open source software projects
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Code NASA seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 7 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | ifttt.github.io | code.nasa.gov |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Open Source @IFTTT and Code NASA. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Open Source @IFTTT since Mar 2021.
Just to be clear this is one center’s first open source release. There’s open source from other centers at https://github.com/nasa. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
NASA has a good set of open source projects available for public use: https://code.nasa.gov/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Yes, this is no-cost but not necessarily open source. NASA open source software can be found at: https://code.nasa.gov/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
When comparing Open Source @IFTTT and Code NASA, you can also consider the following products.
All of Googles open source projects under a single umbrella
Compare Google Open Source to Open Source @IFTTT or Code NASA:


Explore Disney's Open Source projects
Compare Disney Open Source to Open Source @IFTTT or Code NASA:
Explore millions of opensource projects online
Compare OpenKube to Open Source @IFTTT or Code NASA:

Official NASA library, searchable by keywords and metadata
Compare NASA Image and Video Library to Open Source @IFTTT or Code NASA: