Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Code NASA VS CMake

Compare Code NASA VS CMake and see what are their differences

BusinessXray
Automated 60-second forensic business auditing pipeline powered by OpenAI Nano AI. Built for consultants and analysts. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Code NASA logo Code NASA

253 NASA open source software projects

CMake logo CMake

CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.
  • Code NASA Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-15
  • CMake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-21

We recommend LibHunt CMake for discovery and comparisons of trending CMake projects.

Code NASA features and specs

  • Open Access
    The platform provides open access to a wealth of software projects developed by NASA, making it easier for researchers, developers, and the public to utilize and contribute to advancements in technology and science.
  • Educational Value
    Offers educational opportunities by allowing students and educators to explore and use high-quality software from a leading scientific organization, fostering learning and innovation.
  • Collaborative Potential
    Encourages collaboration between NASA, educational institutions, private companies, and individual developers, which can lead to the enhancement and creation of new technologies.
  • Cost Savings
    Utilization of these open-source projects can lead to significant cost savings for organizations and developers by reducing the need to develop similar software from scratch.

Possible disadvantages of Code NASA

  • Limited Commercial Support
    The platform may not provide the level of commercial support that businesses might require, possibly complicating the integration of NASA's code into commercial products.
  • Complex Licensing
    Some projects may have complex licensing agreements that require careful review to ensure compliance, especially for commercial use.
  • Outdated or Discontinued Projects
    Some projects may be outdated or no longer actively maintained, which could pose challenges in terms of usability and security.
  • Technical Barrier
    There may be a high technical barrier to entry for some users, as the software is often highly specialized and may require expertise in particular domains to effectively implement.

CMake features and specs

  • Cross-platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This allows developers to write platform-independent CMake scripts.
  • Build tool agnostic
    CMake can generate build files for a variety of build systems including Makefiles, Ninja, and Visual Studio solutions. This means developers are not tied to a specific build tool.
  • Large community and extensive documentation
    CMake has a large user base and an extensive amount of documentation and tutorials available which can be helpful for new and experienced users alike.
  • Integrated testing support
    CMake includes support for testing frameworks such as CTest, which allows for automated testing of code during the build process.
  • Modular and scalable
    CMake is highly modular, enabling users to create reusable and maintainable code by organizing CMake scripts into libraries and modules.

Possible disadvantages of CMake

  • Steep learning curve
    CMake's complexity and its extensive range of features can be difficult for beginners to grasp, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Verbose syntax
    CMake scripts can often become verbose and difficult to read, especially for large projects. This can make maintenance and debugging challenging.
  • Inconsistent module quality
    The quality and support of different CMake modules can vary, sometimes leading to issues with compatibility or functionality.
  • Performance overhead
    CMake may introduce some performance overhead during the configuration process, especially for very large projects.
  • Complexity in advanced features
    Some of the more advanced features of CMake, such as custom commands and complex dependency management, can be quite difficult to implement correctly.

Analysis of CMake

Overall verdict

  • CMake is generally considered a good tool for managing the build process of software projects, especially those with a complex codebase that spans multiple platforms.

Why this product is good

  • Flexibility
    It offers great flexibility in terms of defining build processes, enabling advanced configuration and optimization techniques to be used.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with many popular IDEs and other tools, providing a smoother development experience.
  • Wide adoption
    CMake is widely used in the industry, which leads to robust community support and regular updates.
  • Cross platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple platforms, which makes it highly valuable for projects that need to be compiled and run on different operating systems.

Recommended for

  • projects requiring cross-platform compatibility
  • developers looking for a powerful build configuration tool
  • complex software projects with numerous dependencies
  • teams that value strong community and industry support

Code NASA videos

No Code NASA videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

CMake videos

+ Add

CMake for Dummies

More videos:

  • Review - CppCon 2017: Mathieu Ropert โ€œUsing Modern CMake Patterns to Enforce a Good Modular Designโ€
  • Review - Hunter, a CMake driven package manager for C/C++ projects - Daniel Friedrich - Lightning Talks

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Code NASA and CMake)

Code NASA

CMake

Tech
100 100%
Tech
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
0 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100
Open Source
100 100%
Open Source
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
JS Build Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Code NASA and CMake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CMake should be more popular than Code NASA. It has been mentiond 55 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Code NASA mentions (7)

  • NASA Stennis Releases First Open-Source Software
    Just to be clear this is one centerโ€™s first open source release. Thereโ€™s open source from other centers at https://github.com/nasa. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • FBI, Partners Dismantle Qakbot Infrastructure in Multinational Cyber Takedown
    NASA has a good set of open source projects available for public use: https://code.nasa.gov/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • NASA's Software Catalog offers hundreds of new software programs for free
    Yes, this is no-cost but not necessarily open source. NASA open source software can be found at: https://code.nasa.gov/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Public satellite telemetry data?
    As for public telemetry it might be hard to get it for free as satellite owners do it for money. NASA maintains a public software page at code.nasa.gov and software.nasa.gov which includes OpenMCT mission control software that can do simulated data. Source: almost 5 years ago
  • Internship/research as a physics major
    Don't underestimate the strength of personal projects. If you ask a professor about their research, I find very often, they ask about things you have done in the past, which sort of feels like shit if youve done nothing huh? I know people who made cloud chambers or shot ions or massive simulations in HS and I was like, a theatre kid which is so irrelevant. BUT. The reason they ask this is that previous experience... Source: about 5 years ago
View more

CMake mentions (55)

  • How I deployed my first project for my devops portfolio: Project Architecture
    I used CMAKE as my compiling tool followed by make. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • DeadLock: Research Results & Tech Stack
    All this C++ project can't be ran as simple C++ code, so I will be building this whole package using CMake. It will streamline building this project onto other computers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Master This Feature of DevEco Studio to Efficiently Implement ArkTS and C++ Glue Code
    For knowledge in this aspect, you can refer to the relevant documents of the CMake build tool: https://cmake.org/. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Creating a Native Desktop GUI Using C++ with GTK
    I used CMAKE to define the build configurations. I find it very convenient that CMAKE generates the Makefile on Linux and can also create a Visual Studio project on Windows. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Top 7 C++ Tools to explore in 2024 if it's not already the case.
    CMake stands for "Cross-platform Make" and is an open-source, platform-independent build system. It's designed to build, test, and package software projects written in C and C++, but it can also be used for other languages. Here's an overview of CMake and its features:. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Code NASA and CMake, you can also consider the following products

Open NASA - NASA data, tools, and resources

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Google Open Source - All of Googles open source projects under a single umbrella

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction toolโ€”that is, a next-generation build tool.

Open Source @IFTTT - A collection of IFTTT OSS projects.

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

Loading...