Co-commit VS RunsOn
Compare Co-commit VS RunsOn and see what are their differences
Email that sounds like you, and gets measurably more like you every week. Drafts in Gmail, Outlook, and the browser. Free to start.
featured
Co-commit
Tuple
USE Together
Gitmoji
Bracket Share
Emoji CSS
Commit Together by Github
Kite
RunsOn
Forgejo
Netlify
GitHub
Cirun.io
Tenki Cloud
GitHub CLI
Task Build
Cheap runners are just one part of the equation: nobody likes slow runs, even if it's cheap.
RunsOn gives you access to some of the fastest machines on the market, thanks to AWS extensive hardware selection.
Which makes RunsOn the fastest provider of self-hosted, fully ephemeral runners on the market.
We automatically build and publish copies of the official runner images at most 24h after their official release, so that you can be certain that your workflows will always work on either GitHub runners, or your own RunsOn runners.
Co-commit RunsOnRunsOn's answer:
10x cheaper than GitHub official runners. Runs in your own AWS account. More secure than sharing your secrets with other third-party tools like BuildJet or Warpbuild.
RunsOn's answer:
Cheap, fast, on-premise alternative to maintaining self-hosted runners.
RunsOn's answer:
CTO / Senior developers
RunsOn's answer:
Built a similar product for one of my clients, reduced CI build cost by 10 times, and improve build speed from 1h to 20min.
Based on our record, RunsOn seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
If you want a 'fixed' cost option for GitHub self hosted runners on your AWS I can't recommend https://runs-on.com/ enough. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
There are a couple and have very good reputation - though I've never used them https://www.blacksmith.sh/ They also say that they're much cheaper than github. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
My team has been using https://runs-on.com/ for AWS instance runners, had a few glitches but largely been great for using AWS instances for runners. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
> You know how I know GitHubโs runners are bad? Because thereโs an entire cottage industry of companies whose sole product is โGitHub Actions, but the runners donโt suck.โ Namespace, Blacksmith, Actuated, Runs-on, BuildJet He's not wrong. Buildjet just announced they were shutting down though, citing recent improvements to the GitHub Actions platform. For the record I maintain the Runs-on [1] he's talking about,... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
I am developing a self-hosted solution for this [1]. Itโs true that itโs somewhat of a pain but JIT runners allow a lot of flexibility that we donโt find elsewhere. [1] https://runs-on.com. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Tuple - Tuple is a Mac-only remote pair programming tool for discerning developers
Forgejo - Forgejo is a self-hosted lightweight software forge. Easy to install and low maintenance, it just does the job.
USE Together - Collaborative screen sharing with multiple mouse cursors
Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket
Gitmoji - An emoji guide for your GitHub commit messages
GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.