Software Alternatives & Startups

CMake VS Nomu

Compare CMake VS Nomu and see what are their differences

CMake

CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Rating
0 reviews
Nomu

The fasting timer where a caterpillar cocoons while you fast and becomes a butterfly when you finish. 16:8 to 72-hour fasts, live science phases, Apple Watch, 14 languages. Private by design.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial $19.99 / Annually
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CMake seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 55 times since March 2021.

social mentions
55 vs 0
Front End Package Manager popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
112 vs 4

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

CMake
Nomu
Website cmake.org tappect.com
Pricing —
Paid Free trial $19.99 / Annually
Platforms —
iOS Android Apple Watch
Company — Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026
Listed in

About CMake and Nomu

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

CMake
Nomu

We recommend LibHunt CMake for discovery and comparisons of trending CMake projects.

Read more about CMake

I got tired of fasting apps that are 90% upsell and require an account to run a timer. So I built Nomu (Flutter, iOS + Android + watchOS). The core idea: fasting phases (fat burning -> ketosis -> autophagy) are invisible, so people quit mid-fast. Nomu maps them onto a mascot that visibly...

Read more about Nomu

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

CMake 5 features
Nomu 5 features
  • Cross-platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This allows developers to write platform-independent CMake scripts.
  • Build tool agnostic
    CMake can generate build files for a variety of build systems including Makefiles, Ninja, and Visual Studio solutions. This means developers are not tied to a specific build tool.
  • Large community and extensive documentation
    CMake has a large user base and an extensive amount of documentation and tutorials available which can be helpful for new and experienced users alike.
  • Integrated testing support
    CMake includes support for testing frameworks such as CTest, which allows for automated testing of code during the build process.
  • Modular and scalable
    CMake is highly modular, enabling users to create reusable and maintainable code by organizing CMake scripts into libraries and modules.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep learning curve
    CMake's complexity and its extensive range of features can be difficult for beginners to grasp, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Verbose syntax
    CMake scripts can often become verbose and difficult to read, especially for large projects. This can make maintenance and debugging challenging.
  • Inconsistent module quality
    The quality and support of different CMake modules can vary, sometimes leading to issues with compatibility or functionality.
  • Performance overhead
    CMake may introduce some performance overhead during the configuration process, especially for very large projects.
  • Complexity in advanced features
    Some of the more advanced features of CMake, such as custom commands and complex dependency management, can be quite difficult to implement correctly.
  • Simple note-taking interface
    Nomu offers a clean, minimalistic design that makes it easy for users to quickly jot down notes, ideas, and reminders without a steep learning curve.
  • Cross-device syncing
    Notes created in Nomu can sync across multiple devices, allowing users to access their information whether they are on mobile, tablet, or desktop.
  • Lightweight and fast performance
    The app is designed to be lightweight, resulting in quick load times and smooth performance even on older or lower-spec devices.
  • Organizational tools
    Nomu provides tagging, folders, or categorization features that help users keep their notes structured and easy to retrieve later.
  • Affordable pricing model
    Compared to some competitors, Nomu offers a cost-effective pricing structure, making it accessible for individuals and small teams on a budget.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

CMake
Nomu

Overall verdict

  • CMake is generally considered a good tool for managing the build process of software projects, especially those with a complex codebase that spans multiple platforms.

Why this product is good

  • Flexibility
    It offers great flexibility in terms of defining build processes, enabling advanced configuration and optimization techniques to be used.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with many popular IDEs and other tools, providing a smoother development experience.
  • Wide adoption
    CMake is widely used in the industry, which leads to robust community support and regular updates.
  • Cross platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple platforms, which makes it highly valuable for projects that need to be compiled and run on different operating systems.

Recommended for

  • projects requiring cross-platform compatibility
  • developers looking for a powerful build configuration tool
  • complex software projects with numerous dependencies
  • teams that value strong community and industry support

No analysis of Nomu yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

CMake 3 videos + Add
Nomu 0 videos + Add

CMake for Dummies

More videos

  • - CppCon 2017: Mathieu Ropert “Using Modern CMake Patterns to Enforce a Good Modular Design”
  • - Hunter, a CMake driven package manager for C/C++ projects - Daniel Friedrich - Lightning Talks

No Nomu videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
CMake
Nomu
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing CMake and Nomu.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Nomu's answer:

Flutter App for ios and Android

What makes your product unique?

Nomu's answer:

The fasting timer that makes the invisible part visible

Most fasting apps are a number counting up. Nomu is a caterpillar that spins a cocoon as your body enters fat burning and emerges as a butterfly when you finish. It sounds silly. It is the reason people stop quitting at hour 13.

What's the story behind your product?

Nomu's answer:

I got tired of fasting apps that are 90% upsell and require an account to run a timer. So I built Nomu (Flutter, iOS + Android + watchOS).

The core idea: fasting phases (fat burning -> ketosis -> autophagy) are invisible, so people quit mid-fast. Nomu maps them onto a mascot that visibly transforms - caterpillar to cocoon to butterfly - and a streak system that evolves its wings over 180 days. A tamagotchi-style loop beats charts for habit retention.

Technical bits: - Local-first: SQLite on device, no accounts, no backend for user data. Export is CSV/JSON. - Flutter + native watchOS app, Home/Lock Screen widgets, Control Center controls via App Intents - Apple Health sync, live phase notifications, auto eating-window countdown - 14 locales, paired haptics + sound design for every interaction

Business model experiment: free-for-life for anyone who installs by September 11 (enforced by a date constant in the app, no server), then a hard paywall for new users only. Early users are grandfathered forever - they're the word-of-mouth engine.

Nomu is built by Tappect, the indie studio behind Nutrify, the AI calorie tracker used to log meals with a photo - see https://www.nutrifytracker.com. Both apps share the same philosophy: private by design, delightful to use daily. Nutrify ships the same local-first pattern with an on-device-first pipeline for food logging.

User comments

Share your experience with using CMake and Nomu. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

CMake 55 mentions
Nomu 0 mentions
  • How I deployed my first project for my devops portfolio: Project Architecture
    I used CMAKE as my compiling tool followed by make. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • DeadLock: Research Results & Tech Stack
    All this C++ project can't be ran as simple C++ code, so I will be building this whole package using CMake. It will streamline building this project onto other computers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Master This Feature of DevEco Studio to Efficiently Implement ArkTS and C++ Glue Code
    For knowledge in this aspect, you can refer to the relevant documents of the CMake build tool: https://cmake.org/. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

View more

Tracking Nomu since Sep 2026.

Alternatives to CMake and Nomu

When comparing CMake and Nomu, you can also consider the following products.