Software Alternatives & Startups

CloudLinux VS Iruka.sh

Compare CloudLinux VS Iruka.sh and see what are their differences

CloudLinux

Making Linux secure, stable, and profitable for thousands of hosting providers and data centers worldwide.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Iruka.sh

Fast native macOS file manager with a synced terminal, SSH, git control, and Power Search. The modern Path Finder & ForkLift alternative. Free 30-day trial.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

CloudLinux
Iruka.sh
Website cloudlinux.com iruka.sh
Pricing
Open source
Company — Startup from Singapore · 1 - 9 employees
Listed in

About CloudLinux and Iruka.sh

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

CloudLinux
Iruka.sh

No description of CloudLinux yet.

Iruka is a native macOS file manager for developers and people who live in the terminal. It's written in Swift (not Electron) and inspired by KDE's Dolphin. Its main feature is a built-in terminal that stays in sync with the folder you're browsing, so you never have to cd to where you already...

Read more about Iruka.sh

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

CloudLinux 5 features
Iruka.sh 3 features
  • Enhanced Server Stability
    CloudLinux uses its lightweight virtualization technology (LVE) to isolate each tenant on a shared hosting server, preventing any single user from consuming excessive resources and crashing the server for everyone else. This ensures consistent uptime and performance.
  • Improved Security with HardenedPHP and KernelCare
    CloudLinux offers HardenedPHP, which patches old and unsupported PHP versions against known vulnerabilities, and KernelCare, which provides live kernel patching without requiring server reboots. These features significantly enhance server security posture.
  • Resource Limit Management
    Administrators can set granular resource limits (CPU, memory, I/O, number of processes, etc.) per user account using LVE Manager. This makes it easy to manage shared hosting environments and ensure fair resource distribution among tenants.
  • CageFS File System Virtualization
    CageFS creates a virtualized file system for each user, preventing them from seeing other users on the server, viewing sensitive configuration files, or exploiting server vulnerabilities. This adds an important layer of isolation and security.
  • Wide Compatibility with Hosting Panels
    CloudLinux integrates seamlessly with popular hosting control panels such as cPanel, Plesk, and DirectAdmin, making it straightforward for hosting providers to adopt without overhauling their existing infrastructure or workflows.

Possible disadvantages

  • Additional Licensing Cost
    CloudLinux requires a paid monthly or annual license on top of the base server cost. For smaller hosting providers or individual server owners, this additional expense can add up and may not always be justifiable compared to free alternatives.
  • Limited to CentOS/RHEL-Based Systems
    CloudLinux is built on top of RHEL/CentOS and does not support other Linux distributions like Ubuntu or Debian. This limits its adoption for hosting providers who prefer or already run non-RHEL-based environments.
  • Learning Curve for Configuration
    While CloudLinux provides powerful resource management tools, properly configuring LVE limits, CageFS, PHP Selector, and other features requires a solid understanding of the platform. Misconfiguration can lead to users being unnecessarily restricted or resources being poorly allocated.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    The additional layers of virtualization, resource monitoring, and file system isolation introduced by CloudLinux can impose a slight performance overhead on the server compared to running a bare, unmodified Linux distribution without these controls.
  • Dependency on CloudLinux Ecosystem
    Adopting CloudLinux means relying on their ecosystem for kernel updates, PHP patches, and security fixes. If the company experiences delays in releasing patches or changes its pricing/licensing model, hosting providers may find themselves locked into a dependency that is difficult to migrate away from.
  • Dual-Pane Interface
  • Terminal Integration
    synced
  • Batch Renaming

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

CloudLinux
Iruka.sh

Overall verdict

  • CloudLinux is a well-regarded, mature Linux OS distribution and toolset specifically designed for shared hosting and multi-tenant server environments, offering strong isolation, resource management, and security features that make it a solid choice for hosting providers.

Why this product is good

  • Provides LVE (Lightweight Virtual Environment) technology for per-tenant resource isolation, preventing 'bad neighbor' effects on shared servers
  • Enhances server stability and security by isolating users so that one account's issues (crashes, resource spikes) don't affect others
  • Offers extended lifecycle support (longer than standard CentOS/RHEL support windows), which is valuable for legacy systems
  • Includes tools like CloudLinux OS Shield, Imunify360 integration, and hardened kernel options for improved security
  • Compatible with popular control panels like cPanel and Plesk, making it easy to integrate into existing hosting stacks
  • Backed by an established company with a long track record in the hosting industry and responsive support
  • Offers granular control over CPU, memory, I/O, and other resources per user account
  • Provides PHP Selector and multiple PHP version support, useful for hosting providers serving diverse client needs

Recommended for

  • Web hosting companies running shared or reseller hosting environments
  • Hosting providers needing to isolate customer accounts on the same physical server
  • Businesses requiring extended OS support lifecycles beyond standard RHEL/CentOS EOL dates
  • Enterprises using cPanel or Plesk that want tighter security and resource control
  • Hosting companies looking to reduce support tickets caused by noisy-neighbor resource contention
  • IT teams managing multi-tenant infrastructure who need governance and monitoring tools built into the OS layer

No analysis of Iruka.sh yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

CloudLinux 3 videos + Add
Iruka.sh 1 video + Add

When To Use Cloudlinux On Your Virtual Private Server (VPS)

More videos

  • - CloudLinux OS+ in a minute: Explore Features
  • - How CloudLinux Plans to Keep CentOS 6 Alive

Iruka: The Mac File Manager With a Terminal That Follows You

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
CloudLinux
Iruka.sh
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing CloudLinux and Iruka.sh.

What makes your product unique?

Iruka.sh's answer:

Iruka's terminal follows you. The built-in terminal panel stays in sync with whatever folder you're browsing, so you never cd to where you already are. Syncing pauses on its own while a long-running command is active. Finder, Path Finder and ForkLift don't do this. Iruka combines it with things developers normally need three or four tools for: one-click SSH, S3/SFTP/WebDAV mounts, git status and diffs, grep-powered content search, and a Review pane that shows which files an AI coding agent just changed.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Iruka.sh's answer:

  • It's built for developers. Most Mac file managers are Finder with extra panes. Iruka is designed around the terminal, git and remote servers.
  • It's native Swift, not Electron, so it starts fast, uses little memory and behaves like a real Mac app.
  • It gives you one place for local folders, SSH servers and S3 buckets. Saved servers connect in one click, you can SCP from the right-click menu, and cloud storage browses like a local folder.
  • It understands code. Markdown renders GitHub-style, CSVs show as a grid, 60+ languages get syntax highlighting, and you can make quick edits in the preview pane.
  • It's a one-time purchase from $19.99 with a 30-day free trial and no credit card, not another subscription.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Iruka.sh's answer:

Developers and terminal power users on macOS: people who constantly switch between Finder and a terminal, manage remote servers over SSH, work with S3 buckets, or use AI coding agents like Claude Code and want to see what changed. Many have come from Linux, where file managers like KDE's Dolphin have had an embedded terminal for years, and they miss it on the Mac.

But honestly, you don't need to use the terminal to love Iruka. It's just a very nice UI, which gives you document and multimedia previews just as much as a terminal (which you can hide)

What's the story behind your product?

Iruka.sh's answer:

On Linux I used KDE's Dolphin, and its embedded terminal that follows you around was something I relied on every day. When I moved to macOS, nothing came close. Finder had no terminal, and the paid alternatives either bolted one on or didn't sync it with the folder. I kept opening a terminal, typing cd, and pasting paths from Finder dozens of times a day. So I built the file manager I wanted: native Swift, a synced terminal at its core, and the developer tools I kept reaching for (SSH, S3, git, grep) built in. "Iruka" means dolphin in Japanese, a nod to where the idea came from.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Iruka.sh's answer:

Swift SwiftUI and AppKit Git Lemon Squeezy (licensing and payments)

User comments

Share your experience with using CloudLinux and Iruka.sh. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with