Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cloudfogger VS Barecopy

Compare Cloudfogger VS Barecopy and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Cloudfogger logo Cloudfogger

Easy and secure encryption for the cloud. Provides security for all cloud storage services like Dropbox, OneDrive and Google Drive.

Barecopy logo Barecopy

Remove hidden metadata from files โ€” 100% in your browser
Not present
Not present

Cloudfogger features and specs

  • File-Level Encryption
    Cloudfogger provides file-level encryption, ensuring that individual files are protected, regardless of where they are stored or how they are transferred.
  • Cross-Platform Availability
    The service supports multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android, making it versatile and accessible from a variety of devices.
  • Ease of Use
    Cloudfogger offers a user-friendly interface which simplifies the encryption process, even for users who may not be tech-savvy.
  • Compatibility with Popular Cloud Services
    The service integrates smoothly with many popular cloud storage providers such as Dropbox, Google Drive, and OneDrive, adding an extra layer of security to these services.
  • Free Basic Version
    Cloudfogger provides a free version with basic features, making encryption accessible to users who may not want to invest in a premium service.

Possible disadvantages of Cloudfogger

  • Discontinued Development
    As of my knowledge cutoff in 2021, Cloudfogger has discontinued active development and updates, which could pose security risks over time as new vulnerabilities remain unpatched.
  • No Support for Linux
    Cloudfogger does not offer a client for Linux operating systems, limiting its usability for users who rely on this OS.
  • Limited Features in Free Version
    The free version of Cloudfogger comes with limitations on advanced features, which might necessitate a premium account for full functionality.
  • Dependency on Cloudfoggerโ€™s Ecosystem
    Files that are encrypted using Cloudfogger can only be decrypted using its software, which could be a problem if the service were to shut down completely.
  • Performance Overhead
    Encrypting and decrypting files can introduce a performance overhead, potentially slowing down operations especially for large files or slower devices.

Barecopy features and specs

  • Simple concept
    Barecopy appears to focus on a streamlined copy or content-related service, which can make it easy to understand and adopt without a steep learning curve.
  • Potential time savings
    Tools in the copy and content space often help users generate or manage text faster, which can save time for marketers, writers, and small businesses.
  • Niche focus
    A specialized tool can serve a specific need more effectively than broad, general-purpose platforms, offering tailored features for its target use case.
  • Web-based accessibility
    As an online service, it can typically be accessed from any device with a browser, removing the need for installation and enabling remote use.
  • Lower barrier to entry
    Smaller or focused services often have simpler onboarding and pricing, making them approachable for individuals and small teams.

Analysis of Cloudfogger

Overall verdict

  • Cloudfogger was a reputable option for those needing file encryption for cloud storage. However, as of now, the service has been discontinued, and its software is no longer supported or available. Therefore, while Cloudfogger was a good option in its time, it is not suitable for use today given the lack of updates and support.

Why this product is good

  • Cloudfogger was a tool used to encrypt files for cloud storage services like Dropbox, Google Drive, and others. It was appreciated for its ease of use and ability to encrypt files locally before uploading, ensuring that only encrypted files were stored in the cloud. This approach provided an additional layer of security for users concerned about privacy and unauthorized access to their cloud-stored data.

Recommended for

    For those seeking active alternatives, it's recommended to look into other encryption services like Boxcryptor, Cryptomator, or services built into modern cloud storage options that provide similar encryption features. These alternatives offer up-to-date support and continued development, ensuring better security and compatibility with current systems.

Cloudfogger videos

TEST / REVIEW #006 - Mit Cloudfogger Dateien verschlรผsseln

Barecopy videos

No Barecopy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cloudfogger and Barecopy)
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Metadata Management
0 0%
100% 100
File Sharing
100 100%
0% 0
Document Management
0 0%
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Cloudfogger and Barecopy.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Barecopy's answer:

Privacy-conscious professionals who share documents and photos: lawyers, journalists, HR and recruiters, real-estate and finance staff, consultants, and anyone in a corporate environment who needs to strip author names, company info, edit history, or GPS location before sending a file out. The corporate-network-friendly, no-upload design specifically targets people whose employers block cloud tools.

What's the story behind your product?

Barecopy's answer:

Barecopy grew out of a real, recurring problem: hidden metadata leaking sensitive information โ€” an author's name, a company, revision history, or the GPS coordinates baked into a photo. Existing online cleaners solved this by uploading your file to their servers, which defeats the purpose. Barecopy was built on the opposite principle โ€” your files never leave your machine โ€” after CDN-blocking corporate networks repeatedly broke server-dependent tools. It's a deliberately simple, self-hosted, single-page app so that the privacy guarantee is provable, not just marketing.

What makes your product unique?

Barecopy's answer:

Barecopy does 100% of its work in your browser. Files are read, analyzed, and cleaned locally โ€” nothing is ever uploaded to a server. Most "metadata remover" tools online quietly upload your document to their backend to process it, which is exactly the wrong trust model for a privacy tool handling sensitive files. Barecopy's entire app is a single static page with self-hosted libraries and zero external requests, so even on locked-down corporate networks (which block CDNs) it works โ€” and there's no server that could leak your data.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

Barecopy's answer:

Barecopy is used by privacy-conscious individuals and professionals across legal, journalism, HR, and corporate roles. By design it processes files entirely on the user's device and collects no data, so it keeps no customer list.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Barecopy's answer:

  • Truly private by design โ€” not a promise, an architecture. There's no upload endpoint.
  • Broad format coverage โ€” Word/Excel/PowerPoint (DOCX/XLSX/PPTX), PDF, and JPG/PNG/WebP photos, all in one tool.
  • Lossless photo cleaning โ€” strips EXIF/GPS while copying pixels untouched (no re-compression).
  • Deep cleaning, not just the obvious fields โ€” clears document core/app/custom properties, thumbnails, PDF info dict + XMP metadata.
  • Verifiable results โ€” an optional on-brand PDF report records what was found and removed per file, including the SHA-256 of the clean copy.
  • Honest, fair pricing โ€” free for up to 3 files at a time; Pro is โ‚ฌ4/mo.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Barecopy's answer:

  • Plain HTML/CSS/JavaScript โ€” no framework, no bundler, no build step; one static page.
  • Client-side libraries, self-hosted: JSZip (OOXML unzip/rezip), pdf-lib (PDF metadata), exif-js (EXIF).
  • Browser-native APIs for byte-level image metadata stripping.
  • Hosting: Vercel (static), with a single serverless function only for the contact form (SMTP via nodemailer).
  • Payments: Polar for the Pro subscription.

User comments

Share your experience with using Cloudfogger and Barecopy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cloudfogger and Barecopy

Cloudfogger Reviews

16 Tresorit Alternatives
Cloudfogger will bring the names of Dropbox, as well as Box.net or even in terms of the OneDrive, all along with the local storage. It will be creating a virtual drive on top of your system right through which you can process all your files on the automatic versions.

Barecopy Reviews

We have no reviews of Barecopy yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cloudfogger and Barecopy, you can also consider the following products

BoxCryptor - Boxcryptor encrypts your sensitive files before uploading them to cloud storage services like Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, Box, and many others.

MetadataRemove.app - Remove EXIF, PDF, Word, Excel, PPT, and video metadata, edit metadata, tagging mp3 in your browser.

Mega - Secure File Storage and collaboration

Google Drive - Access and sync your files anywhere

Cryptomator - When it comes to saving your files on a cloud server, it is important to ensure the security of those files. Keeping your delicate files out of the wrong hands can save you a lot of time and hassle. Read more about Cryptomator.

TeamDrive - The zero knowledge cloud sync & share solution for businesses. 100 % privacy guaranteed. Secure collaboration for your teams. End-To-End-Encryption is guaranteed and certified.