Clearbit
Lusha
Apollo.io
DiscoverOrg
Hunter.io
ZoomInfo
UpLead
Lead411
Codekeeper
PRAXIS Technology Escrow
Rightsline
ANAQUA Corporate
Company Portfolios Revealed
Annuity Payer
Hack Lang
Cortellis
Clearbit CodekeeperBased on our record, Clearbit seems to be a lot more popular than Codekeeper. While we know about 18 links to Clearbit, we've tracked only 1 mention of Codekeeper. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Some display names need a lookup table, not fuzzy strings. Pairs like Investing.com / Fusion Media Limited or Lyrie.ai / OTT Cybersecurity Inc. Share almost no tokens, so WRatio stays low and that's correct behavior. For irreconcilable aliases like that you still want GLEIF, Clearbit, or simply a maintained slug โ legal_name map. Fuzzy matching handles stylistic drift on the same name; it canโt handle unrelated... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint โ the most permissive of the major providers โ gives you around 32% hit rate on Gmail addresses versus 74% on corporate domains. I measured this across 6,200 signups for a... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns significantly more contacts per domain in Prospector-style queries than Clearbit's Prospector ever did โ the tradeoff is more stale titles in the result set. Hunter.io is fast and cheap... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Match rate of 38% in my test, but the data quality on what it does match is solid: title, seniority, industry, company size all returned cleanly. If you're already in HubSpot and enriching form fills in-place, Clearbit/Breeze is probably your lowest-friction option even at lower match rates. If you're not in HubSpot, there's no reason to choose it over PDL or Prospeo. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2โ8 seconds of latency per row in my runs and costs more per match than going direct. For a CRM webhook flow where you need sub-second enrichment calls, Clay is the wrong layer to hit first. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
I had a similar requirement recently and ended up going with CodeKeeper (https://codekeeper.co/), mainly because they had a portal that seemed mostly self-serve. Because they are based in The Hague, and because my client had domestic restrictions, I also had to add the US-only storage option. Their pricing was also a factor in my decision. YMMV. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Lusha - Search less. Sell more.
PRAXIS Technology Escrow - PRAXIS Technology Escrow is a platform that provides Software Escrow service to make it easy for you to keep your investment away from risk.
Apollo.io - Apolloโs predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.
Rightsline - Rightsline consolidates your entire data and contracts in one place.
DiscoverOrg - DiscoverOrg is an IT sales intelligence platform providing technology marketers access to data, IT org charts, and real time projects.
ANAQUA Corporate - ANAQUA Corporate is a property management software that helps to streamline its operations and offers strategic decision making.