Classic Shell VS Foam

• Customizable Start Menu
  Classic Shell allows users to customize the Start Menu to a significant extent, including changing the style and appearance to resemble earlier versions of Windows (XP, Vista, and 7).
• Performance Enhancements
  The software is lightweight and generally does not consume significant system resources, making it a performance-efficient alternative to the default Start Menu.
• Enhanced Usability
  It brings back certain features and functionalities that are familiar and preferred by users, enhancing overall user experience, particularly for those transitioning from older Windows versions.
• Frequent Updates
  Classic Shell is regularly updated to ensure compatibility with new Windows updates, providing a reliable solution over time.
• Free of Cost
  Classic Shell is available for free, making it an accessible option for anyone looking to improve their Start Menu without financial investment.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Official Support
  As Classic Shell is developed primarily by volunteers, official support may be limited compared to commercial software.
• Complexity
  The extensive customization options might be overwhelming for less tech-savvy users, leading to a steeper learning curve.
• Potential Compatibility Issues
  Although updated frequently, there can be temporary compatibility issues with the latest Windows updates, requiring users to wait for the next release.
• Lack of Modern Features
  Classic Shell aims to replicate older versions of Windows Start Menus, which might lack some of the modern features available in the default Windows Start Menu.
• Discontinued Development
  Official development of Classic Shell was discontinued in December 2017. While community forks like Open-Shell continue the project, the lack of official development could be seen as a disadvantage.

• Open Source
  Foam is an open-source tool, which means it is free to use and allows for community-driven development and contributions. Users can modify the source code to fit their specific needs.
• Markdown Support
  Foam uses Markdown, a lightweight and easy-to-read syntax, making it simple to create and manage notes. This also allows for easy integration with other Markdown-based tools and platforms.
• Integration with Visual Studio Code
  Foam is designed to work seamlessly with Visual Studio Code (VS Code). This provides users with a powerful and familiar text editor environment, complete with extensions and customization options.
• Graph View
  Foam includes a graph visualization feature that helps users see and navigate the relationships between their notes, making it easier to understand and manage complex information.
• Bidirectional Links
  Foam supports bidirectional links, allowing users to create connections between notes in both directions. This enhances the note-taking experience by enabling a more interconnected and dynamic information structure.
• Community and Documentation
  Foam has a growing community of users and contributors, as well as comprehensive documentation. This support network helps users troubleshoot issues, share tips, and improve their knowledge of the tool.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited to VS Code
  Foam relies on Visual Studio Code as its primary environment. Users who prefer different text editors or platforms might find this limitation restrictive and less convenient.
• Learning Curve
  Although Foam leverages Markdown, users may still face a learning curve, especially if they are not familiar with VS Code or the specific features and extensions required to maximize Foam's capabilities.
• Performance with Large Datasets
  Foam can struggle with performance issues when handling large datasets or a high number of notes. This can lead to slow response times and inefficient workflows.
• Limited Mobile Support
  Foam is primarily designed for desktop use within VS Code, which means that mobile support is limited. Users looking for a seamless cross-platform experience might find this aspect lacking.
• Customization Complexity
  While Foam offers a high degree of customization, setting up and configuring the tool to meet personal preferences and workflows can be complex and time-consuming for some users.

Classic Shell with Windows 10!

More videos

These panels DESTROYED my STUDIO....REVERB? - ArrowZoom Foam Review

More videos

• Scrollbars Are Becoming a Problem

  There's a great add-on called... ClassicShell http://classicshell.net/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

• What software would be used to remove the red elements and change the layout of the tray icon?

  Windows Classic Shell is what I have used for over a decade. It brings back the old start menu and can be customized. Source: over 3 years ago

• Microsoft is turning Windows 11's Start Menu into an advertisement delivery system

  ClassicShell is no longer being developed. OpenShell succeeded it. (c.f., http://classicshell.net/). Source: almost 4 years ago

View more

• AI Coding Tip 020 - Create a Second Brain

  Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• Migrating from DokuWiki to Obsidian

  I've been using foam instead of obsidian for my personal knowledge base. It works rather well. And it's completely free and ultimately just markdown. While I might wish it was djot, I don't wish hard enough to make that so myself... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

• I Use Obsidian

  I gave up on Obsidian and just use Foam (https://foambubble.github.io/foam/) and/or vimwiki. I just can’t get into overwrought, arbitrarily designed organization schemes or proprietary apps (Foam-managed content is just plain Markdown,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

View more