Classic Shell VS cppq

• Customizable Start Menu
  Classic Shell allows users to customize the Start Menu to a significant extent, including changing the style and appearance to resemble earlier versions of Windows (XP, Vista, and 7).
• Performance Enhancements
  The software is lightweight and generally does not consume significant system resources, making it a performance-efficient alternative to the default Start Menu.
• Enhanced Usability
  It brings back certain features and functionalities that are familiar and preferred by users, enhancing overall user experience, particularly for those transitioning from older Windows versions.
• Frequent Updates
  Classic Shell is regularly updated to ensure compatibility with new Windows updates, providing a reliable solution over time.
• Free of Cost
  Classic Shell is available for free, making it an accessible option for anyone looking to improve their Start Menu without financial investment.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Official Support
  As Classic Shell is developed primarily by volunteers, official support may be limited compared to commercial software.
• Complexity
  The extensive customization options might be overwhelming for less tech-savvy users, leading to a steeper learning curve.
• Potential Compatibility Issues
  Although updated frequently, there can be temporary compatibility issues with the latest Windows updates, requiring users to wait for the next release.
• Lack of Modern Features
  Classic Shell aims to replicate older versions of Windows Start Menus, which might lack some of the modern features available in the default Windows Start Menu.
• Discontinued Development
  Official development of Classic Shell was discontinued in December 2017. While community forks like Open-Shell continue the project, the lack of official development could be seen as a disadvantage.

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

Classic Shell with Windows 10!

More videos

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Scrollbars Are Becoming a Problem

  There's a great add-on called... ClassicShell http://classicshell.net/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

• What software would be used to remove the red elements and change the layout of the tray icon?

  Windows Classic Shell is what I have used for over a decade. It brings back the old start menu and can be customized. Source: over 3 years ago

• Microsoft is turning Windows 11's Start Menu into an advertisement delivery system

  ClassicShell is no longer being developed. OpenShell succeeded it. (c.f., http://classicshell.net/). Source: almost 4 years ago

View more

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.