CKEditor VS Yi

• Real-time collaboration editing
  Premium
• Comments
  Premium
• Track changes
  Premium
• Revision History
  Premium
• CKBox File Manager
  Premium
• Autoformatting
• Autolink
• Autosave
• Basic text styles (Bold, Italic, Highlight, Underline, Strikethrough, Subscript, Superscript)
• Code & Quote Blocks
• Drag and drop
• Export to PDF and Word
  Premium
• Find and replace
• Font styles
• Image resize, style & alignment
• Image responsiveness
• Inserting images by pasting URL
• Keyboard shortcuts
• Lists (bulleted, numbered, checklists)
• Markdown support
• Math and Chemical formulas
  Premium
• Media embed
• @Mentions
• Pagination
  Premium
• Paste from Word & G-Docs
• Read-only support
• Restricted editing
• Spell and grammar checking
  Premium
• Tables support with columns resizing, selecting rows and columns
• Text layout
• Word count
• React integration
• Vue JS integration
• Angular integration

• Extensibility
  Yi is highly extensible due to its design around libraries and plugins, which allows users to customize and extend its functionality to suit their needs.
• Haskell Integration
  Being implemented in Haskell, Yi provides native support for Haskell development, making it an ideal choice for Haskell programmers who want an editor that integrates well with their language of choice.
• Efficient Key Bindings
  Yi supports efficient and flexible key binding configurations, including emulation of popular editors like Vim and Emacs, which enhances productivity for users familiar with those systems.
• Unicode Support
  Yi has comprehensive support for Unicode, which is beneficial for users who need to work with a wide array of character sets and symbols.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Configuration
  Due to its highly customizable nature, configuring Yi can be complex and require a deeper understanding of Haskell, which might be daunting for new users.
• Limited Community and Resources
  Yi has a smaller user base compared to more mainstream editors, which can lead to fewer available resources, plugins, and community support.
• Performance Concerns
  Being written in Haskell, some users might experience performance issues, particularly when handling very large files or complex operations, compared to editors written in more performance-oriented languages.
• Steep Learning Curve
  The combination of needing to learn Haskell for configuration and the unique aspects of Yi itself can result in a steep learning curve for new users.

CKEditor 5 - Collaboration features

More videos

YI Outdoor Security Camera Review

More videos

• 14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
  itsfoss.com · Sep 2023

  CKEditor 5 is a feature-rich and open-source WYSIWYG editing solution with great flexibility. The user interface looks modern. Hence, you may expect a modern user experience.

• Looking for a CKEditor? Try these 10 Alternatives
  blog.hubspot.com · Jul 2023

  CKEditor is a popular, versatile WYSIWYG text editor which allows you to write content directly on web pages or online applications. It can be used to create Word-like documents or provide a simple toolbar for email...

We have no reviews of Yi yet. Be the first one to post

• Show HN: I'm building an app to replace Overleaf and Notion

  The actual "word processor" or editor of notion is hot garbage, especially for software/keyboard people. Try out something like https://ckeditor.com/ and it is infinitely better. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• Storybook Starter Guide: Learn Design System Principles

  For example, at CKEditor, we use a hybrid approach — Syntactically Awesome Style Sheets (Sass) preprocessor and CSS variables:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Your rich text could be a cross-site scripting vulnerability

  Another sign that your application might vulnerable to SXSS is simply whether or not you are using a rich text editor, such as TinyMCE or CKEditor. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

View more

Tracking Yi since Mar 2021.