
Citely
Verify academic references, recover missing DOIs, and inspect evidence from Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and arXiv before publication.

Grammarly
QuillBot
Turnitin
Quetext
ProWritingAid
GPTZero
PlagiarismSearch
Scribbr is an online proofreading and editing service used for the academic activities of the students.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Scribbr seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | citewise.dev | scribbr.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | 2026 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


CiteWise checks whether an academic reference resolves to the correct scholarly work, compares metadata across trusted sources, recovers missing DOI information, and shows field-level evidence before publication.
No description of Scribbr yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Citewise Demo
What is a Literature Review? Explained with a REAL Example | Scribbr 🎓
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing CiteWise.dev and Scribbr.
CiteWise.dev's answer
CiteWise checks whether a reference points to a real scholarly work, and it shows the evidence behind each result. It doesn’t format citations. For every reference you see which fields matched (title, authors, year, publication, DOI), which conflicted, and which source records each result came from. Matching is done by deterministic, field-by-field scoring against Crossref, DataCite, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, PubMed and arXiv. An LLM only helps parse messy input and never decides whether a reference is real.
CiteWise.dev's answer
Most citation tools either generate formatted references or give a yes/no “fake or real” answer. CiteWise gives you the evidence and leaves the decision to you: field-level matches, metadata and DOI conflicts, check completeness, and publication updates such as retractions where available. You can audit a whole bibliography (paste it, or import BibTeX, RIS, EndNote or CSL-JSON), record review decisions, and export HTML, CSV or JSON reports. A free account includes 10 checks per month.
CiteWise.dev's answer
Researchers, graduate students, librarians and academic editors who need to confirm a bibliography is accurate before submission. This includes people checking references suggested by ChatGPT or other AI writing tools, and anyone who has to verify a long reference list without opening every DOI by hand.
CiteWise.dev's answer
AI writing tools made it easy to produce references that look correct but point to the wrong paper, or to no paper at all. Checking them by hand means resolving DOIs and comparing titles, authors and years one at a time. I built CiteWise to automate that lookup while keeping the evidence visible. Early on I tried letting an LLM judge whether a reference was real and dropped the idea: LLMs are good at producing things that look right, which is the same problem that creates fake citations. CiteWise now uses deterministic matching against scholarly databases, and the LLM is limited to helping parse messy input.
CiteWise.dev's answer
Java 17 and Spring Boot 3 on the backend, Next.js 15 on the frontend, PostgreSQL on Supabase, Clerk for authentication and Creem for payments. Reference data comes from the Crossref, DataCite, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, PubMed and arXiv APIs.
CiteWise.dev's answer
CiteWise launched in November 2026 and doesn’t have named customers yet Early users are individual researchers and students
A few notes. I didn’t make up any customer names for the last question, because you have about 8 registered users and none of them are paying yet. Listing made-up institutions on a directory site is easy to get caught on, and it damages credibility. If the form won’t accept that answer, you can leave it blank. The story answer is a draft based on the LLM bug you wrote about in your dev.to post, so replace it with your real reasons for starting the project, like a personal experience or what your classmates went through. Specific details make it more convincing.
Share your experience with using CiteWise.dev and Scribbr. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of CiteWise.dev yet. Be the first one to post
Scribbr is a direct competitor to Turnitin. It offers proofreading and editing, plagiarism checking, and a citation generator. The big difference is that a team of real human academic editors do the proofreading, not...
Scribbr plagiarism checker allows you to set search repositories so you can select what it should not consider like Submitted work, Crossref and Internet blog data, etc. while detecting similarities. Talking about the...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking CiteWise.dev since Sep 2026.
Use that link to help you understand the concept of essay writing and the details that need to put into your essay writing, as well as the types of essays and understanding of Essay writing. Pride and prejudice compare and contrast... Source: over 4 years ago
Statstutor.ac.uk, andy field, and scribbr.com (this one is usually written by students so REALLY easy to understand). Source: over 5 years ago
When comparing CiteWise.dev and Scribbr, you can also consider the following products.

AI citation checker and academic source finder for verifying references, detecting fake ChatGPT citations, and finding sources for research claims.
Compare Citely to CiteWise.dev or Scribbr:

Clear, effective, mistake-free writing everywhere you type.
Compare Grammarly to CiteWise.dev or Scribbr: