Software Alternatives & Startups

CiteGaps VS ShellNewHandler

Compare CiteGaps VS ShellNewHandler and see what are their differences

CiteGaps

See where AI assistants cite your competitors, then close the gap

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid $19 / Monthly (Lite)
ShellNewHandler

SourceForge.net: ShellNewHandler details page

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, ShellNewHandler seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 2
SEO Tools popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

CiteGaps
ShellNewHandler
Website citegaps.com sourceforge.net
Pricing
Paid $19 / Monthly (Lite) Official pricing
—
Company 2026 —
Listed in

About CiteGaps and ShellNewHandler

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

CiteGaps
ShellNewHandler

CiteGaps tracks how your brand appears in AI answer engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews. Every week it asks 25 to 100 buyer questions for your market and records which brands each answer names, in what order, and which websites it cites. You get your...

Read more about CiteGaps

No description of ShellNewHandler yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

CiteGaps 6 features
ShellNewHandler 0 features
  • AI Visibility Tracking
    Weekly answers from ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode
  • Competitor Benchmarking
    Visibility share, citation share and position against named competitors
  • Citation Source Analysis
    The websites each AI engine cites for your buyers' questions
  • Content Drafting
    Drafts FAQ pages, comparison pages and outreach that close each gap
  • White-label Reports
    Weekly PDF reports under your agency's logo, up to 5 brands
  • Weekly Email Reports
    A PDF report in your inbox every Monday

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

CiteGaps
ShellNewHandler

No analysis of CiteGaps yet.

Overall verdict

  • ShellNewHandler is a niche, lightweight utility hosted on SourceForge designed to give users more control over the Windows 'New' context menu (the ShellNew menu). It can be considered good for its specific narrow use case, but it is an older, minimally maintained tool that may not suit all users, especially those on modern Windows versions.

Why this product is good

  • Provides direct control over customizing the Windows right-click 'New' menu, allowing users to add or remove file type entries
  • Lightweight and free, without bundled bloatware typical of some other free utilities
  • Simple and focused in scope, making it easy to understand for its specific purpose
  • Open distribution via SourceForge allows transparency and no-cost access

Recommended for

  • Power users who want to declutter or customize the Windows New context menu
  • IT administrators managing standardized desktop environments across multiple machines
  • Users comfortable with older utility-style tools and Windows registry-related tweaks
  • Not recommended for casual users seeking modern, actively supported software with regular updates

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
CiteGaps
ShellNewHandler
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
SEO
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing CiteGaps and ShellNewHandler.

What makes your product unique?

CiteGaps's answer

Most AI visibility tools stop at a score. CiteGaps also writes the fix. Every week it asks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews the questions your buyers ask. It shows how often you're named against your competitors and which sources the engines trust. Then it drafts the FAQ page, comparison page or outreach that closes each gap, and links every recommendation to the exact answers that prove it.

What's the story behind your product?

CiteGaps's answer

We built CiteGaps while launching our own product, a domain-monitoring tool. We'd done the usual SEO work, then asked ChatGPT and Gemini the questions our buyers ask. Across 50 answers, our product was named in 2%, and our biggest competitor in 38%. No analytics tool showed us this, because those buyers never reached our site. So we built the tool we needed: it asks the AI engines our buyers' questions every week, shows who gets recommended and which sources they cite, and drafts the pages that close the gap.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

CiteGaps's answer

TypeScript, Node.js, React and Vite, on Google Firebase: Cloud Functions, Firestore, Authentication and Hosting. Google Gemini reads the AI answers and drafts content. Payments run on Razorpay and Dodo Payments, and email on Resend.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

CiteGaps's answer

  • It drafts the content, not just a brief or a to-do list.
  • Flat monthly price for a set number of questions. No credits to count, no add-ons. Plans start at $19 a month.
  • Answers are collected live from the engines, as your buyers see them.
  • A PDF report lands in your inbox every Monday, white-labelled with your logo on the Agency plan.
  • 7-day money-back guarantee, and a free one-question check with no sign-up.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

CiteGaps's answer

We don't name customers publicly. CiteGaps is used by:

  • SaaS companies
  • Brands that sell online
  • SEO and content agencies that report AI visibility to their clients

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

CiteGaps's answer

Founders and marketing teams at software companies and brands that sell online, whose buyers now ask AI assistants which product to choose. Also SEO and content agencies that want weekly, branded AI visibility reports for their clients.

User comments

Share your experience with using CiteGaps and ShellNewHandler. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

CiteGaps 0 mentions
ShellNewHandler 2 mentions

Tracking CiteGaps since Oct 2026.

  • I recently got libreoffice, but now the new option in right click looks like a mess. Can someone help me get rid of them please?
    Use Shell New Handler. Run the portable app and simply untick the items you don't want to appear in your new context menu. Source: about 4 years ago
  • This menu should be easy to add/remove programs to... Who is really creating Access Databases from this menu often enough to keep it here? (Not me!) Is there an easy way to edit this?
    I've always used ShellNewHandler for this. It's a really simple portable utility that allows you to remove most of the items from that menu. Tested it out on Windows 11 and it's still compatible. Source: over 5 years ago

Alternatives to CiteGaps and ShellNewHandler

When comparing CiteGaps and ShellNewHandler, you can also consider the following products.